- 1 Who are the ladies behind Camila
- 2 What were the duties of the ladies-in-waiting
- 3 Who is the Queen consort now
- 4 Who are the two ladies sitting with Camilla
- 5 Why was the lady-in-waiting sacked
- 6 Will Camilla be the queen if Charles dies
- 7 Are Kate Middleton and Camilla friends
- 8 Where did ladies-in-waiting sleep
- 9 Who is the lady in Turquoise at the coronation
Who are the ladies behind Camila
The coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla was quite the who’s who when it came to guests – amongst the some 2,000 people gathered in Westminster Abbey were the likes of senior royals, celebrities and foreign dignitaries. There were also two women, both dressed in white, accompanying Camilla, that had people talking.
So, who are the two women that were privileged enough to sit close by to Queen Camilla during the coronation ceremony? One is Annabel Elliott, the Queen’s sister, and the other is Lady Lansdowne (also known as Fiona Mary Petty-Fitzmaurice, Marchioness of Lansdowne), both of whom perform the royal role of a Queen’s Companion.
They’re just one of six to hold that honour. When she took over as Queen Consort, Camilla made a big change by scrapping the title of ‘ladies in waiting’ at the Palace and instead making the role something less frequent and a lot more informal, so in order to be a part of her inner circle, these two women are sure to be seen as special in the new Queen’s eyes. WPA Pool // Getty Images
What were the duties of the ladies-in-waiting
Japan – In Japan, the imperial court offices was normally reserved for members of the court aristocracy and the ladies-in-waiting or ‘palace attendants’ were commonly educated members of the nobility. During the Heian period (794–1185) women could hold court offices of substantial responsibility, managing the affairs of the Emperor.
Female palace attendants were employed by the Imperial Bureau of Palace Attendants from among the court aristocracy, but were required to have sufficient education in Chinese classics to be accepted. During the Sengoku period (1467–1603), the highest rank of a lady-in-waiting was the ‘Female Assistant to the Major Counselor’, who ran the affairs of the daily life of the Imperial Household.
The second rank was Koto No Naishi (Female Palace Attendant), who acted as intermediary between the Emperor and those seeking an audience and issued his wishes in writing. Ladies-in-waiting acted as imperial secretaries and noted the events at court, visitors and gifts in the official court journals.
In contrast to China, female palace attendants managed the palace of the imperial harem rather than eunuchs, and could hold high court offices in the Emperor’s personal household. Female palace attendants were divided in two classes, which in turn had several ranks, signifying their task. The first class consisted of the nyokan, or ladies-in-waiting who held court offices: naishi-kami ( shoji ) naishi-suke ( tenji ) and naishi-no-jo ( shoji ).
The second class were the female palace attendants: myobu, osashi, osue and nyoju, The ladies-in-waiting worked as personal assistants, tending to the Emperor’s wardrobe, assisting the emperor’s baths, serving meals, performing and attending court rituals.
Who is the Queen consort now
Queen or queen consort? What to know about Camilla’s title Excitement builds the day before King Charles III and Camilla, the queen consort, will be crowned at Westminster Abbey in a religious ceremony. (May 5) Videos Excitement builds for King Charles’ coronation Excitement builds the day before King Charles III and Camilla, the queen consort, will be crowned at Westminster Abbey in a religious ceremony.
(May 5) Photos Published :,, LONDON (AP) — Now that alongside her husband, King Charles III’s wife is officially known as, While it sounds more official than “queen consort,” the changing of titles does not signify any practical difference in the role of the 75-year-old royal. Queen consorts do not formally share the sovereign’s powers, and dropping the “consort” part of the title does not change that.
Nonetheless, the change marks a milestone in Camilla’s decadeslong road to rehabilitating her image — from as the other woman in Charles’ first marriage to Princess Diana, to a senior royal member largely accepted by the British public. The question of what title Camilla would hold when Charles became king has long been a subject of contention, due to sensitivity about her status as Charles’ second wife.
Camilla and her first husband, Andrew Parker-Bowles, divorced in 1995, shortly after Charles gave an explosive television interview admitting his relationship with Camilla. Charles and Diana divorced the following year. In 1997, there was a global outpouring of grief when Diana died in a car crash. Camilla and Charles waited until 2005 to marry in a low-key private civil ceremony.
For many years it wasn’t clear if Camilla would eventually be styled as queen. settled the matter last year, when she gave the blessing for Camilla to be known as queen consort. The endorsement was widely seen as a formal sign that the royal family had finally accepted Camilla as a respected senior member.
Who are the two ladies sitting with Camilla
Who’s who in the new Coronation portrait? King Charles and Queen Camilla are pictured with Pages of Honour and Ladies in Attendance New Coronation portrait: King Charles III and Queen Camilla with their Pages of Honour and Ladies in Attendance. Pictured (left to right) Ralph Tollemache, Lord Oliver Cholmondeley, Nicholas Barclay, Prince George, the Marchioness of Lansdowne, King Charles III, Queen Camilla, Annabel Elliot, Freddy Parker Bowles, Arthur Elliot, Gus Lopes and Louis Lopes Hugo Burnand/Royal Household 2023 The King and Queen are joined by their eight and two Ladies in Attendance in a stunning new Coronation portrait.
- The formal photograph was taken by Hugo Burnand at Buckingham Palace on Saturday 6 May, hours after Their Majesties were crowned.
- It is the latest in a series of portraits documenting just some of those who were central to the Coronation service at Westminster Abbey.
- Other pictures include individual portraits of the King and Queen; a line-up of working members of the Royal Family; and a powerful photo of King Charles with and, who are next in line to the throne.
In the latest image, the King is wearing the, and Robe of Estate. Queen Camilla is wearing Queen Mary’s Crown and Robe of Estate. Standing either side of Their Majesties are the two Ladies in Attendance: Queen Camilla’s sister, Annabel Elliot, and Her Majesty’s dear friend the Marchioness of Lansdowne, who is also one of the six Queen’s Companions.
- Fanning out from either side of the central foursome are the Pages of Honour.
- Ing Charles with Prince William and Prince George Hugo Burnand/Royal Household 2023 The King and Queen had four each.
- Standing on the King’s side in the Coronation portrait are Ralph Tollemache, Lord Oliver Cholmondeley, Nicholas Barclay and Prince George.
Alongside the Queen are the Queen’s grandsons Freddy Parker Bowles and Gus and Louis Lopes, and the Queen’s great-nephew Arthur Elliot. Here, Tatler reveals exactly who’s who in the formal portrait
Who were the queens ladies-in-waiting?
In addition to Baroness Hussey, the late monarch had a number of other women around her, known as the ‘Head Girls’, some of whom were a part of the Queen’s team for over 60 years. The Queen’s other ladies-in-waiting were: Dame Mary Morrison, Lady Elizabeth Leeming, Susan Rhodes and Dame Annabel Whitehead.
How many ladies-in-waiting does Kate Middleton have?
What is a lady-in-waiting? – In Britain, ladies-in-waiting are titled noblewomen who serve not only the queen, but also high-ranking women in the royal household. Kate Middleton has one, while the queen’s sister Princess Margaret had many. Queen Elizabeth II herself had nine before the Duchess of Grafton and Lady Farnham died, with seven remaining, including Susan Rhodes, Lady Elizabeth Leeming, The Hon Mary Morrison and Virginia Ogilvy, Countess of Airlie.
Do ladies-in-waiting live at the palace?
The ladies in waiting did not live at the Royal residences on a permanent basis. However, if their duties required they would stay in Royal apartments in London or within Buckingham Palace to be near the Queen, The National reports. Ladies in waiting have been a part of Royal life since the 15th century.
Can a lady-in-waiting get married?
lady-in-waiting, in European history, a woman of noble birth who serves a female monarch as a member of the royal household. Any noble woman performing personal service for a queen is often referred to as a lady-in-waiting, although exact titles differ depending on a woman’s particular office or marital status, as well as the language being used.
Similar posts exist outside Europe, perhaps most notably in Asia. The office of lady-in-waiting originated during the Middle Ages as a consequence of the growth and proliferation of queenly households. Queens who spent extended periods separate from the king needed to maintain a discrete household of servants and retainers.
Some of these servants were required to assist the queen with dressing, personal hygiene, and other intimate tasks and thus needed to be female. Initially, such posts were held by paid servants. However, this changed amid the growing medieval association between a temporal monarch and the sanction of divinity. Britannica Quiz A Royal Vocabulary Quiz The composition of the group of ladies-in-waiting attending to the queen varied based on politics and individual monarchs, including both the queen and the king. Records show that some queens had more than 100 ladies-in-waiting, but most had significantly smaller households.
Kings had varying levels of influence over the women who served in their queens’ households. Contemporary politics could also impact the composition of a queen’s household, as in the so-called “bedchamber crisis” (1839), when Victoria of England refused to allow Robert Peel, the Conservative leader, who was trying to form a government, to replace some of her ladies-in-waiting with women affiliated with his own political party,
The duties of ladies-in-waiting varied across Europe but were generally similar in the medieval and early modern periods. Ladies-in-waiting performed intimate duties such as putting on and removing the queen’s clothing and bathing her. They were expected to put her needs above those of their own husbands and children.
They spent most of the day with the queen and provided her with companionship and entertainment in her private chambers. To that end many ladies-in-waiting could sing, play musical instruments, and dance. In addition, they maintained a prominent role in the court’s public life, attending to the queen and participating in such events as ambassadorial receptions and masques.
For this reason, preparation to become a lady-in-waiting included gaining proficiency in several languages. Ladies-in-waiting were universally expected to maintain high moral standards, avoiding scandal and often staying disengaged from politics. However, the political influence of ladies-in-waiting in European courts is well documented.
- It was sometimes the subject of gossip and ridicule, for smearing the reputation of a lady-in-waiting was an effective political tool against a monarch.
- Such was the case of Catherine de’ Medici ‘s female household, many of whom were accused of using seduction for political gain in 16th-century France.
Exercising political power in the medieval and early modern patronage systems of royal courts was in fact a key element of the lives of ladies-in-waiting and often the reason that they sought such offices. A lady-in-waiting had direct access to the queen, who wielded varying degrees of influence over the king and his court.
This allowed ladies-in-waiting to advance the petitions and career interests of their families and others. Many ladies-in-waiting received no official compensation for their work and were understood to have taken the office solely to gain social and political capital. In turn, many queens required their ladies-in-waiting to pass along intelligence about their families and members of the court.
Ladies-in-waiting were particularly powerful in the courts of female monarchs who ruled independently, as they had direct access to and influence with the highest power in the land. Modern ladies-in-waiting continue to exist in royal courts like that of the United Kingdom, acting as personal assistants and companions at official events. Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. Subscribe Now Rebecca M. Kulik
Was a lady-in-waiting a servant?
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Diego Velázquez, “Las Meninas” (1656) A lady-in-waiting (also called waiting maid ) is a female personal helper at a noble court, A lady in waiting would be in charge of waking, dressing and accompanying a lady in her daily activities She helps a queen, a princess, or other noblewoman,
A lady-in-waiting is often a noblewoman of a lower rank than the one she attends. She is not thought to be a servant, Their duties are different depending on the court. People with artistic talents were usually chosen. In Russia, girls between “fourteen or twenty ” were chosen, and left the court when she married,
People like Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour, Catherine Howard, and Catherine Parr were all ladies-in-waiting.
What happens to the ladies in Waiting Now?
The King keeps on Queen Elizabeth II’s Ladies-in-Waiting, including Lady Susan Hussey Lady Susan Hussey is centre of shot behind the Princess of Wales
The King has decided to keep on a number of Ladies-in-Waiting, with the aides being rebranded as Ladies of the Household.Lady Susan Hussey, Mary Morrison and Dame Annabel Whitehead will continue on with their work, despite the death of their mistress in September.The three senior aides will assist His Majesty when hosting formal occasions at,Photographs published last week showed Lady Susan Hussey in her new role as she attended the State Banquet for the President of South Africa at the,The late Queen had a number of Ladies-in-Waiting, some of them serving The Queen for 60 years.They were some of the late monarch’s closest confidants, accompanying the late monarch to engagements and attending to her in private.Lady Susan Hussey was one of Elizabeth’s longest serving aides, and became so close to the monarch that she became godmother to Prince William.Lady Susan also formed part of ‘HMS Bubble’ during the lockdowns, and was the only person allowed to accompany the Queen to the funeral of her late husband, Prince Philip.A Lady-in-waiting’s jobs mainly consist of helping their mistress collect flowers at events, attending private and personal matters, running errands and handling general correspondence.Unlike in past times, not all Ladies-in-Waiting are of noble birth with many being are siblings or close friends of the ladies they serve.In an effort to modernise the monarchy, Queen Camilla has not appointed any Ladies-in-waiting, instead choosing to appoint six friends as ‘companions’.Although rebadged, it is understood that these companions will fulfil a similar role to a lady, and will accompany Her Majesty at official engagements.
: The King keeps on Queen Elizabeth II’s Ladies-in-Waiting, including Lady Susan Hussey
Why was the lady-in-waiting sacked
Image caption, Ngozi Fulani, born in the UK, was persistently asked where she was “really” from The late Queen’s lady-in-waiting Lady Susan Hussey has apologised and resigned after she repeatedly asked a black British charity boss where she was “really” from.
- Ngozi Fulani, a charity founder, was questioned about her background at the charity event at the palace on Tuesday.
- Ms Fulani, said she was “totally stunned” by Prince William’s godmother’s comments.
- The palace described the remarks as “unacceptable and deeply regrettable”.
- A spokesperson for Prince William said “racism has no place in our society”.
“The comments were unacceptable, and it is right that the individual has stepped aside with immediate effect,” they said. Lady Hussey, 83, was a close confidante of the late Queen and accompanied her at the funeral of the Duke of Edinburgh last year. She was a key and trusted figure in the Royal Household for decades, and part of her latest role had involved helping to host occasions at Buckingham Palace.
Will Camilla be the queen if Charles dies
Will Camilla be queen if King Charles dies? – If Charles, 74, dies before Camilla, she will have the name of “queen dowager” bestowed upon her, according to reports, As Camilla is excluded from the Windsor bloodline, she would not be the sole queen in the event that Charles passes away before she does.
Does William have to bow to Camilla?
Yes, the current protocol is that they bow to their father, now King, and Camilla, now Queen, the first time in the day that they meet. Whether they bow in private, is between the King and his sons.
Are Kate Middleton and Camilla friends
Inside Camilla’s friendship with Kate – sharing tips to gorgeous gifts Published: 15:07 BST, 28 May 2023 | Updated: 18:09 BST, 30 May 2023
- has brought together loyal band of women as ‘companions’ to support her during her reign as Queen.
- But much of her developing popularity derives from her closeness to another member of the Royal circle – Catherine,,
- Camilla’s entrance into the family had been tricky, particularly after her affair with became a public matter.
- It has been reported that, at one point, the Queen told her eldest son:
But with time, that changed. Camilla gained favour with her mother-in-law – and her image softened further as she took Kate under her wing. Camilla, now Queen, took Kate under her wing before her marriage to William Camilla was a helpful guide for Kate as she prepared for her wedding in 2011 (pictured leaving Clarence House together for the evening celebrations after William and Kate’s wedding) Camilla taught Kate to focus on the faces of cameramen she recognised so as to make her appear more at ease in photographs Even before Kate’s marriage to, Camilla had offered guidance her on royal dos and don’ts and shared details of her favourite beauticians.
- They added: ‘They were all getting on very well and they clearly hadn’t asked for an out-of-the-way table and nor did they attempt to lower their voices.
- ‘There was one moment which was clearly meant to be amusing when Kate said “what happens if William doesn’t turn up?”‘
- There were several ‘hand-holding’ occasions in the build-up to the big day.
- Camilla suggested that her own manicurist Marina Sandoval from the Jo Hansford hair salon in Mayfair give Kate a £36 ‘signature manicure’ before the event.
- Camilla is said to have intervened when Kate was considering wearing flowers in her hair on her wedding day, suggesting a tiara would be more appropriate.
- She gave Kate a highly personal wedding gift: a gold charm-style bracelet with a small disc engraved with Catherine’s cyphers and hers.
- The bracelet, which features two large ‘C’s under a coronet with Camilla’s surrounded by a circle, is similar to a piece worn by Camilla which she rarely takes off.
- Kate Nicholl, Vanity Fair’s Royal Editor, explained on a Channel 5 documentary how Camilla became a rock for both Kate and Meghan when they became engaged to her stepsons, William and Harry.
‘Kate didn’t know how to be royal, so she would have been an outsider. She was pursued by the press and Camilla knew how that felt,’ said Ms Nicholl. ‘In many ways, Camilla had paved the way for Meghan. Camilla would have been there to tell her not to take any criticism personally, but this is just what happens when you’re an outsider,’ she added.
Ate, seen with King Charles and Camilla, was also able to talk to Camilla about charity work The image of Camilla sitting down to eat with Kate, a princess-in-waiting, has an echo of an earlier lunch organised – 30 years previously – by Camilla with Charles’ wife-to-be, Diana., who had just left the flat she shared with three friends to move into Clarence House.
The aim was to make her feel at ease.
- Camilla’s mentorship of Kate extended beyond the wedding.
- She also helped Kate learn how to deal with more prickly members of the family, such as Princess Anne and taught her, for example, to focus on the faces of cameramen she recognised to make her seem more at ease in photographs.
- Kate was also able to talk to Camilla about charity work, discussing the idea of Kate helping a specific charity intensively for a limited time of one or two years during special appeals.
- When Kate became a chatelaine of Kensington Palace, Camilla was on hand to help, warning her that the couple would need a minimum staff of a butler, a housekeeper, a ladies’ dresser, a valet, a cook, chauffeur plus several other workers.
- One close family friend told The Daily Mail’s Richard Kay how important Camilla’s help had been, bearing in mind William’s lack of capability in that direction.
‘At the best of times, the royal men just don’t have much sensitivity when it comes to helping ease new members into the royal life,’ said the friend. ‘They’re not unkind – they just don’t think.’
- By cultivating a relationship with Camilla, Kate has reportedly helped smooth over the at times tense relationship between William and his father, King Charles.
- In her book Camilla: From Outcast to Future Queen Consort, Angela Levin said that the Princess of Wales made real effort to spend time with both her husband’s father and his stepmother, making Kate the family’s ‘peacemaker’.
- Friction supposedly arose between William and his father and Camilla, now Queen Consort, after the pair married in 2005.
By cultivating a friendship with Camilla, Kate has reportedly helped smooth over tensions in the relationship between William and his father Kate has used their shared interests, including a love of the arts, to bond with the couple, meeting up with them by herself – without William in tow.
‘Fortunately, time helped improve Camilla’s relationship with senior Royals, including Prince William, largely thanks to the Princess of Wales, who is a peacemaker,’ says Ms Levin, a former Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday journalist. ‘Camilla is also a conciliator and doesn’t nurse grievances. They both believe that supporting their husbands is a priority.
‘Catherine has a love of the arts, which William doesn’t particularly share. She often goes both privately and publicly with the Queen Consort and King Charles to see exhibitions.’ : Inside Camilla’s friendship with Kate – sharing tips to gorgeous gifts
Does Camilla have to curtsy to her husband?
Since Charles and Camilla became King and Queen Consort following the late Queen’s death, the Royal Family’s curtseying tradition has altered slightly. After May 9, 2023, this tradition will be set in stone as the royal couple’s titles are made official.
- However, while some royal experts have a lot to say about curtseying, others have previously claimed the practice is nonsense.
- Express.co.uk contacted Buckingham Palace to find out more about curtsying, but they declined to comment.
- This is what is known about the custom according to the Royal Family’s website and other sources.
Although considered old-fashioned to some, royal women are expected to bow and curtsy to one another, based on a document the late Queen produced back in 2005. Called the Precedence of the Royal Family to be Observed Court, it listed the royal women and their seniority to one another.
- Even though Camilla was not born into royalty, members of the Royal Family had to curtsy to her when she married the then-Prince Charles, heir to the throne, in 2005.
- However, going against tradition, the Queen changed this due to the circumstances of Camilla and Charles’ marriage.
- READ MORE: Prince Harry’s unusual gesture that ‘nobody ever does’ – expert claims The same rules applied to Meghan Markle – the Duchess of Sussex had to curtsy to everyone when alone, but didn’t have to bow before Beatrice and Eugenie if she was with Prince Harry,
She did, though, have to curtsy to Anne. Curtsying protocol applies in private, as well as in public, according to a Telegraph source. They told the paper: “What they do when there are no outsiders present I can’t tell, but I suspect they do, They all did with the Queen.” Since Charles became King last September, the major change in rules has been that Camilla is now ahead of Anne in the pecking order.
All royal women must now curtsy to her. And, since she is the most senior royal, at the top of the pecking order, she does not need to curtsy to any other female royal. READ MORE: Kate Middleton’s royal ‘destiny’ was forecasted an expert suggests Another claim that has previously circulated among royal experts and watchers is that royal women have always curtsied only to the monarch.
Therefore, by this logic, that means Eugenie and Beatrice, for example, would only bow to Camilla and Charles, and not Anne or Kate, even though the latter two are also more senior to them. Royal experts and fans have also expressed their own opinions on the practice of curtsying on social media in recent months.
Royal expert Joe Little, from Majesty Magazine, previously wrote on Twitter: “Royal Highnesses bow and curtsey only to Majesties. Why is that so hard to understand? Nothing to do with the order of precedence.” A royal fan added: “Joe is right, someone who is HRH, whether by birth or marriage, is equal.
HRHs do not curtsy to each other.” Pamela Marie wrote: “Respect. Simple as that. Curtseying to your Queen or King or senior member of the Royal Family is a sign of respect.” Twitter user @monimoob commented: “The curtseying and bowing thing to the Queen or appropriate member of the British Royal Family is not law.
- It’s a highly suggested courtsey.
- More scrutiny is placed on members of the UK or Commonwealth, but most defintely not required of, say, an American.” Ian Oliver added: “Indeed these people are no better than anyone else, that is why the Royal Family are continually curtseying to the Queen.
- She must have curtseyed countless times to her father.
We all bow or curtsey to the sovereign, anointed by God.”
What was the private call between Charles and Camilla?
What was the transcript of the ‘phone sex’ between Charles and Camilla?
- The fifth season of is set to drop on on Wednesday 9 November to the delight of fans of the hit series.
- The historical drama focuses on the life of and her family from the 1940s to modern times.
- takes over from as Her Majesty, which will be the first season to launch following the death of the monarch in September 2022.
- The new season will follow the breakdown of Charles and ‘s marriage, with the couple played by Dominic West and Elizabeth Debicki respectively.
- It features actor Olivia Williams as Camilla Parker Bowles, who is outed as Charles’ mistress during the season.
- Their secret relationship became public knowledge after the separation of Charles and Diana, with the publication of an intimate telephone call between the two.
But what was said during the infamous “Camillagate” scandal? Here’s everything you need to know. Charles and Camilla on their wedding day in 2005
- Also known as “Tampongate”, a six-minute telephone call between Charles and Camilla was released by in January 1993.
- The call reportedly took place in 1989, when both parties were married to other people.
- As well as detailing their yearning for each other, it famously included a line in which the former Prince expressed his wish to be a tampon in a bid to be closer to Camilla.
“Mmm. You’re awfully good at feeling your way along,” Camilla tells Charles. “Oh stop! I want to feel my way along you, all over you and up and down you and in and out, particularly in and out,” he replies. “Oh, that’s just what I need at the moment,” Camilla says.
- I know it would revive me.
- I can’t bear a Sunday night without you.” Charles goes on to add that he “fills up tank”, stating that he “needs several times a week”.
- He says: “Oh, God.
- I’ll just live inside your trousers or something.
- It would be much easier!” Camilla laughs: “What are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers? Oh, you’re going to come back as a pair of knickers.” Charles replies: “Or, God forbid, a Tampax.
Just my luck! My luck to be chucked down a lavatory and go on and on forever swirling round on the top, never going down.” The pair sign off the call by affirming their love for each other, with Charles telling Camilla: “Your greatest achievement is to love me.” She replies: “I’d suffer anything for you.
- The tape sent shockwaves through Buckingham Palace as the pair were both married to other people at the time of the conversation.
- It also acted as the catalyst for Camilla’s divorce from Andrew Parker Bowles.
- Charles and Diana’s separation was announced in December 1992, while their divorce was finalised in 1996.
- In August 1997, Diana was killed in a car crash in a road tunnel in Paris after being pursued by paparazzi.
- Her partner, film producer Dodi Fayed, also died in the accident alongside the couple’s driver, Henri Paul.
- Throughout this time, Charles maintained his relationship with Camilla, and eventually married her in 2005.
Dominic West as Prince Charles and Elizabeth Debicki as Diana, Princess of Wales in The Crown Yes, one of the episodes of The Crown features the recording and the release of the tape, as well as the reaction to the tape from the royal family. Elsewhere, Dominic West said that the scandal made him, adding that Camilla was treated very badly.
- “I remember thinking it was a sordid, embarrassing discussion but, revisiting it, I found it was just an intensely personal conversation, and what was sordid was the prurient interest in it.”
- He added: “It’s very sweet, tender and gauche but, like any intensely personal conversation, just not for public consumption.”
- In an interview with, he,
- He said: “What’s really is how invasive and disgusting was the press’s attention to it, that they printed it out verbatim and you could call a number and listen to the actual tape.”
- “I think it made me extremely sympathetic towards the two of them and what they’d gone through.”
: What was the transcript of the ‘phone sex’ between Charles and Camilla?
Where did ladies-in-waiting sleep
The role of the ladies-in-waiting changed under the two queens-regnant. Whilst Henry’s wives had had some influence over him, and they, in turn, might be influenced to a degree by their women, in the households of Mary and Elizabeth, women had an opportunity for real political power.
Each queen had, in descending order of rank, three Ladies of the Bedchamber, seven Ladies and Gentlewomen of the Privy Chamber, four chamberers (who undertook more menial tasks), and six maids-of-honour. In addition were the great ladies – wives of senior noblemen who might be at court who but were not officially of the household.
A good example is Lady Margaret Douglas, Countess of Lennox, cousin to both the Tudor queens. She and Mary were close friends and the countess spent a good deal of time at court in Mary’s reign. However, on Elizabeth’s accession, she was no longer welcome.
Another lady who was demoted was Lady Katherine Grey, another cousin of both queens, who had been given a position as a gentlewoman of the bedchamber to Mary, despite the fact that she was the sister of Lady Jane Grey, executed after her father and father-in-law used her to try to oust Mary from the throne.
On Elizabeth’s accession, she was demoted from the bedchamber, to the presence chamber, the least intimate role. In Charlotte White’s essay on the households of Mary and Elizabeth,in ‘ Tudor Queenship: The Reigns of Mary and Elizabeth ‘ she makes the interesting point that Mary’s court was far less partisan than Elizabeth’s – Mary had courtiers and ladies who were friends and relatives of those who had opposed her succession and her policies, whilst Elizabeth was almost entirely surrounded by her mother’s kin – Careys, Howards and Knollys.
White’s thesis is that this left Elizabeth out of touch with some of her more distant nobles and contributed to the Rising of the Northern Earls in 1569. Elizabeth was an exacting mistress. She allowed her favourite ladies little time off. Her cousin, Katherine Carey, Lady Knollys, was required to return to court as soon as possible after bearing her numerous children.
Later in her life, Elizabeth became increasingly irascible with the younger women and it was not unknown for her to hurl things at them. Elizabeth disliked eating in public. Food would be sent to her privy chamber and the ladies would wait on her in privacy, carving the meat, and pouring the wine.
Does the Queen consort have a lady-in-waiting?
Buckingham Palace said Sunday that Queen Consort Camilla is giving up the antique tradition of appointing ‘ladies-in-waiting’ and has picked five of her close friends to be ‘Queen’s Companions,’ a new title with slightly different duties, in a modest sign of updating in the new reign of King Charles III.
Who is the lady in green at the coronation?
Who was the mystery woman in green at the coronation? Many of the millions watching the Coronation of King Charles might have wondered who was the woman in the teal dress carrying a sword in front of the King? It turns out it was Portsmouth MP Penny Mordaunt, Leader of the House of Commons and Lord President of the Privy Council.
- She became the first woman to carry the sword of state – a symbol of the new king’s authority – during the procession at Westminster Abbey.
- Her task in the ceremony included carrying the heavy sword for a full 51 minutes, which weighs eight pounds (3.6kg), before exchanging it for the jewelled sword of offering and presenting that to Charles.
Mordaunt kept a serious face and did not break a sweat while she was watched by thousands of people. Mordaunt previously told Matt Chorley on Times Radio that she had been doing press-ups ahead of the big day and had practised using a weighted replica. “Spare a thought for Penny Mordaunt’s triceps after nearly two hours,” wrote one person, as another quipped: “What a shift from Penny Mordaunt.
- Finally she gets to put the sword down.
- Get her in the Olympics.” Tony Blair’s former spin doctor, Alastair Campbell, tweeted during the event: “Don’t let anyone ever say I never say anything positive about Tories,
- I am in awe of Penny Mordaunt’s arm and shoulder strength!” Mordaunt Tweeted: “Honoured to be part of the #coronation with thousands of others who played their part.
I’m very aware that our armed forces, police officers and others have been marching or standing for hours as part of the ceremony or to keep us all safe. In comparison, my job was rather easier. “Huge and heartfelt thanks to all who made this so remarkable.
I’m so proud of you all and the King and Queen today.” As President of the Privy Council, she became the first woman in UK history to proclaim a new monarch. The politician wore a teal caped dress designed by luxury ready-to-wear brand Safiyaa, embroidered with a fern motif, which is a nod to the privy council.
The teal colour, called “Poseidon”, is a reference to her Portsmouth constituency. She arrived wearing ballerina flats, with studded bows and later changed into a pair of nude stilettos. A source told The Sunday Times last month: “She is paying for herself as there is no budget for it, and no question that any taxpayers’ money should be spent on it.
Is Camila Based on a true story?
10 /10 A Beautiful, Powerful Film “Camila” takes place in Buenos Aires, Argentina (1847-1848) during the tyrannic rule of Governor Juan Manuel de Rosas. The film recounts the tragic true story of Camila O’Gorman, a 19 year old socialite, who falls madly in love and runs away with a young Jesuit Priest, Ladislao Gutierrez.
For a few months they were able to live happily as man and wife in a small village near the border of Brazil where they worked as school teachers. Respected by all who knew them, and unaware of their real identity, Camila and Ladislao were eventually recognized by a priest and captured. Imprisoned and executed without a trial by Rosas’ orders, their bodies were placed together in a double coffin.
At the time of her death Camila was eight months pregnant (but, perhaps due to censorship the film alters that fact) and her execution, along with Ladislao’s, prompted the downfall of Rosas’ reign. This is a story that goes beyond doomed love, but also focuses upon personal and political freedom.
- Susu Pecoraro (Camila), who bares a strong resemblance to the real Camila, and Imanol Arias (Ladislao) are magnificent.
- This film is a masterpiece! 14 out of 17 found this helpful.
- Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
- Permalink “In Memory of Camila O’Gorman.” In 1982, the Argentine military government seized the Falkland Islands, also known as Las Islas Malvinas, from the British.
The British deployed combat forces to the South Atlantic and recaptured the territory in a war that lasted ten and a half weeks. This led to the downfall of the Argentine military junta and a reversion to democracy, establishing conditions which in 1984 brought to the screen a true story that had been suppressed by political, religious, and/or cultural forces for nearly fourteen decades.
- It is one of the most popular movies in the history of Argentina, from among those produced by that nation.
- Camila refers to Camila O’Gorman, and opens very briefly in her childhood with the arrival at her family’s ranch of a stagecoach bearing her grandmother, who is to be placed under house arrest.
Camila’s father fully consents to the arrangement, siding with the authorities rather than with his mother, who is on the wrong side of contemporary political affairs. The opening then shifts forward to Buenos Aires, 1847. Camila, now a young woman of about 19, is closeted with and huddled over some newborn kittens she knows will earn her father’s disapproval if he discovers them.
In the late 1840s, Argentina is under the control of a dictator, General Rosas, and the federals. The unitarians, some in exile and others trying to stay under the radar (as it were), are the latent opposition. The plot can be summarized simply: A socialite daughter from a wealthy family falls in love with a (celibate) Jesuit priest.
It is not only taboo in a Catholic society, but is taboo in a Catholic society at the wrong place and the wrong time, and neither the federals nor the unitarians contribute positively to the outcome. As the kittens meet their fate and the opening credits conclude, we view a statement dedicating the movie: “In memory of Camila O’Gorman .” History, and director Maria Luisa Bemberg, are serious about the advisory, so be forewarned, and be aware also that the movie has an R rating.
- The film coloring is memorable, and Susu Pecoraro in the lead actress role gives a strong performance.8 out of 11 found this helpful.
- Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
- Permalink I recommend this movie.
- I would recommend this movie for a variety of reasons.
- Most importantly, it gives a clear impression of what life was like in Argentina at this time.
The power that the government, Rosas, had over the people is mind boggling. The fact that a father could be brainwashed enough to choose the government over the life of his own daughter is sickening! This just illustrates the power and backwardness of Rosas’ dictatorship.
I also enjoyed this movie for the romantic aspect of the story. It kept you in suspense, while you routed for the couple’s escape to happiness. The moving ending of the film leaves you with much to think about.13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink Passion and History “Camila” is a love story that is based on true events.
It is a unique movie in that it draws the audience to it with the promise of passion, but it keeps the audience intrigued with its historical representation of Rosas’ Argentina. The forbidden love affair between Camila, the daughter of a wealthy land owner, and Ladislao, a young priest, is defeated by the intensity of Argentina’s patriarchal society.
Maria Luisa Bemberg’s presentation of the power of Rosas’ regime is historically accurate, as is her depiction of the passion and independence of Camila.9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink i recommend this movie After watching Camila, I thought that the movie displayed true history of Argentina.
The idea of religion and social class are demonstrated thoroughly throughout the movie. Camila takes on a strong role as a lady who is determined to be with her man. However, this man is a priest and has to obey to the church and g-d. Rosas helps define the true meanign of dictatorship with his brutality toward everyone.
- Camila is independent and very passioniate therefore the she has many conflicts with Rosas.
- After watching the movie, i did notice that the director is byased and sticks to her beliefs and attitudes.
- The main idea is for Argentina to protect its national reputation.
- Overall, this movie portrays many historical aspects and should be shown in other classes.7 out of 12 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 7 /10 well-made historical soaper This film is about a doomed relationship between the daughter of a rich fascist-type landowner in Argentina about 1830 or so (after the successful revolution against the Spanish).
The new government, it seems, feels that the end justifies the means and repression is used to keep control of the fledgling nation. Camila finds that she is not attracted to the macho rich suitors but instead finds herself drawn to the new Jesuit priest. Despite common sense and many obstacles, they run off together.
What I found most interesting in the movie was the character of her father, who was instrumental in tracking them down and exacting punishment. In many ways, the plot reminded me of The Thorn Bird mini-series combined with a fascist-like backdrop. A pretty good film overall.
Be aware, however, of the nudity. It’s NOT as much as you might expect in such a film but considering he’s a priest, it’s bound to offend some.5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 10 /10 Beautiful and tragic story of forbidden love, tears will flow During the 1800s in Argentina, an oppressive dictator named Rosas rules the country with an iron fist.
Everyone must wear a red ribbon to show their loyalty to the man while certain books are banned, among other decrees. A beautiful young lady named Camila has been born into a wealthy family. She is free-spirited and finds the dictators rules are oppressive.
- Secretly, she borrows risque books from the shopkeeper.
- By chance, her parish gets a new priest named Ladislao, quite handsome and dedicated.
- It’s almost love at first sight, with the priest trying everything to avoid his feelings.
- Even when the book seller is executed for circulating banned books, Camila is undeterred.
Therefore, the couple secretly elopes and moves to a rural area far from Buenos Aires. But, Rosas orders his soldiers to find them. Will they be discovered? This gorgeous film has sumptuous sets, costumes, and photography. The two stars are incredibly handsome and touching while the horrors of dictatorship are made manifest.
Even if you dislike subtitles you won’t want to miss Camila. Just have a bucket handy for your tears.1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink A love story set during times of dictatorship. “Camila” is a love story set in Colonial Argentina. Camila is a young woman hungry for change and knowledge of the unknown.
She meets Ladislao, a young priest whom with she immediately falls in love with. The two decide to escape in order to fulfill their desire for each other. They settle in a remote village but still must face the consequences of their decision. Directed by Maria Luisa Bemberg, “Camila” tells the story of a passionate woman who will fight for what she desires and is willing to sacrifice everything for it.
- The film is true to the times in which it is based and true to the characters it is based on.
- Rosas, the dictator at the time, is portrayed in a way that is also true to history.
- The director Bemberg is also a passionate woman and filmmaker who struggled with censorship in the making of this film, but prevailed.
Although it is based on real people, some of the characters are shaped in order to benefit the ideals of the director, but a good film nonetheless. I also recommend “I, the Worst of All” by the same director.4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink 8 /10 Forbidden Fruit Is Always The Sweetest Warning: Spoilers Forbidden Fruit Is Always The Sweetest Since you probably already know the general plot to ‘Camila’ your big question is, “Is it worth my time to watch this film and have my heart strings pulled hard?” Yes. ‘Camila’ certainly pulls the heart strings of any viewer.
The final scene is one of the most dramatic in history. The production quality and acting is exceptional. ‘Camila’ should also be credited as with what it doesn’t contain which most/all Hollywood romances do. Overly graphic sex and political agendas. ‘Camila’ is considered controversial for the obvious forbidden romance and Hollywood worried about it being too offensive to Catholics to be a success.
- As a Catholic myself I dreaded some kind of political speech.
- I was surprised to see none.
- In fact there are no types of anti Catholic diatribes or speeches at all.
- The story is powerful enough to stand alone.
- We don’t need to hear a speech about a father petitioning the governor to override the law and execute his pregnant daughter.
The characters know it’s just as horrific as the audience. ‘Camila’ is also smart enough to avoid graphic or even passionate sex scenes. In fact there’s no nudity, simulated sex, or even passionate kissing. Only moderate passionate kissing. Again the story is strong enough to stand on its own.
- I’ll never forget the horrific graphic sex scene between Nicole Kidman and Jude Law.
- OK! The audience gets it! They’re making love! We do not need to see part A going into part B! Less is more.
- The only negative point which prevents me from giving ‘Camila’ a full 10 stars is that more of the drama pulling of heart strings is focused around the lovers’ execution rather than their love.
I just wasn’t feeling to romance. Honestly, if the film ended with the lovers riding happily into the sunset I wouldn’t recommend it at all. Most of the reviewers here seem to agree. The drama really revolves around the lovers’ deaths rather than their lives.2 out of 4 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 10 /10 the tragical desire of love. I just don’t think any other argentine movie can compare. It’s easily the country’s best film ever, and it’s just so timeless and amazing. I cried hard, and so easily connected with the desire and passion both lead actors had with each other.2 out of 3 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 2 /10 Melodramatic claptrap Warning: Spoilers *** This review may contain spoilers *** *Plot and ending analyzed* Camila (1984) is a pompous, excessively melodramatic story that rarely rises above the crass emotionalism of a cheap novela, or tele-novela (a soap opera in Latin-American countries).
The film stock reduces it even further, since it seems to have been shot on some ‘video’ camera. The angles are so dull and boring, there’s hardly any life in this film at all. In the 1840’s of Buenos Aires, Argentina, an utterly lifeless respectable woman, who later falls into the category of “demimonde”, lives her boring life with her tyrannical father, who is overbearing, imperious and autocratic.
At an instant, there’s not much for us to root for, since these wealthy people are so repulsive. Yet the director, María Luisa Bemberg, thinks we should side with Camila, because she reads a few “banned” books. The director throws everything at us from afar, from the drowning of some pet cats on the tyrannical father’s order, to the beheading of the bookseller.
- Clearly, she’s not one to engage the audience with slow-nuances, but merely histrionics.
- Enter some Jesuit priest, Ladislao Gutiérrez, equally boring and without merit.
- Well, Camila takes to him right off.
- I can’t see how she falls for him so quickly, he’s about as empty as a bare bottle that’s molded up in the cellar.
The rest of the story has the authorities searching for them after they’ve consummated their “love”. Everything is brought down by a priest appearing out of nowhere, who finds them in some local village and they are executed. The film is pathetic, emitting little sympathy from clear-headed viewers; it is gut-wrenching in the extreme.
- Instead, it seems to be more of a tome or dictum intending to show how the affairs of the heart override any social order.1 out of 7 found this helpful.
- Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
- Permalink Camila This melodrama directed by Maria Luisa Bemberg is a story of a passionate woman who wants nothing more than to pursue her desire for love and life.
The movie shows the audience the importance of the church and social classes and enables us to view the attitudes and emotions of people living during the dictatorship of Juan Manuel de Rosas. However, it is evident that Bemberg has a slight bias in that the movie is seen through the eyes of Camila O’Gorman.
- This film is a wonderful example of how the movies intend to manipulate the viewer, allowing Camila to have all the rights and giving none to Rosas is rather biased.
- The film strongly emphasizes the dictatorship of Rosas and the viewer is given the opportunity to see the profundity and power of this dictator.2 out of 11 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 8 /10 Art Imitating Life A former friend of mine, who was very much into foreign films, “accidentally” rented this movie for both of us to watch after the dissolution of my relationship with a Jesuit, in 1999.
Perhaps she was trying to assure me that I was better off now, because I would not be shot by a firing squad for having slept with a priest? Never mind that I was being treated for post-traumatic stress disorder and was suffering through nightmares of Jesuits trying to murder me and make it look like suicide.
After watching this movie, I was left numb and freaked-out by the residual irrational feeling that Camila might have been me in a former life? Nine years later, I’m more able to assess the movie apart from my own experience of the Catholic priesthood and its extremely misogynistic tendencies.
- I admire Camila for having had a strong mind and will of her own, but I would tell her or any other woman involved with a priest that these men just aren’t worth our sacrifice of self for their sakes, much less martyrdom.3 out of 9 found this helpful.
- Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
- Permalink 2 /10 Horrible Some of the most horribly scripted, badly acted melodrama i’ve ever seen.
The “love story” is cliché at best, and the execution scene really seems to have just been thrown in for the hell of it. This movie is Oscar Fishing in every sense of the phrase, desperately trying to jerk at the judges’ emotions while really forgetting what the movie should be about.
- And what was with the goddamn screaming at Christ scene? This movie has the production value of the last season of Miami Vice, and the acting skills are equivalent to Backdoor Rangers III, Hunting Season.
- Just because it’s foreign doesn’t mean it’s good.
- Horrible Movie.3 out of 21 found this helpful.
- Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Who is the lady in Turquoise at the coronation
Who is the lady in blue at the coronation? Penny Mordaunt’s role in King Charles’ Coronation ceremony explored British politician and the leader of the House of Commons, Penny Mordaunt had a surprising role in King Charles III’s coronation. On May 6, 2023, the Lord President of the Privy Council made history by being the first woman to lead the procession to Westminster Abbey while carrying the sword of state, which represents the power of the new monarch.
Her role in the ceremony entailed bearing the eight-pound sword perpendicular to her body before switching it for the jeweled sword of offering and presenting it to Charles. The King then came forward and extended the sword. Then Mordaunt put it on the altar and paid for it with “redemption money”. At the start of the Coronation, Mordaunt led the parade through with the Sword of State from the 17th century.
She held on to it until the Jewelled Sword of Offering was given to her in its place. In accordance with an ancient custom, Penny Mordaunt “bought back” the gleaming sword from the Archbishop of Canterbury in exchange for one hundred newly-minted 50p coins bearing Charles’ likeness.