- 1 Which teams are eliminated from World Cup
- 2 How did Jamaica beat Brazil
- 3 Has any team ever been kicked out of the World Cup
Which teams are eliminated from World Cup
Teams out of the World Cup: Every nation eliminated – The table below was updated throughout the 2022 tournament as teams fell by the wayside. The most recent team eliminated is at the top. Host nation Qatar were the first team ousted, and they were followed by Canada as both failed to pick up a single point in their first two matches of the group stage.
A total of 16 teams were eliminated after the group stage, and another eight were knocked out in the Round of 16. The group stage closed on Friday, Dec.2, and the Round of 16 was completed on Dec.6, with the quarterfinals wrapping up in two days on Dec.9-10. The semis were also played over two days on Dec.13-14.
The third-place match (Dec.17) preceded the final on Dec.18.
|Nation||FIFA Ranking||Date Eliminated||Stage Eliminated||How Eliminated|
|France||4||Dec.18||Final||Loss vs. Argentina (penalties)|
|Morocco||22||Dec.14||Semifinals||Loss vs. France|
|Croatia||12||Dec.13||Semifinals||Loss vs. Argentina|
|England||5||Dec.10||Quarterfinals||Loss vs. France|
|Portugal||9||Dec.10||Quarterfinals||Loss vs. Morocco|
|Netherlands||8||Dec.9||Quarterfinals||Loss vs. Argentina (penalties)|
|Brazil||1||Dec.9||Quarterfinals||Loss vs. Croatia (penalties)|
|Switzerland||15||Dec.6||Rd of 16||Loss vs. Portugal|
|Spain||7||Dec.6||Rd of 16||Loss vs. Morocco (penalties)|
|South Korea||28||Dec.5||Rd of 16||Loss vs. Brazil|
|Japan||24||Dec.5||Rd of 16||Loss vs. Croatia (penalties)|
|Senegal||18||Dec.4||Rd of 16||Loss vs. England|
|Poland||26||Dec.4||Rd of 16||Loss vs. France|
|Australia||38||Dec.3||Rd of 16||Loss vs. Argentina|
|USA||16||Dec.3||Rd of 16||Loss vs. Netherlands|
|Serbia||21||Dec.2||Groups||Loss vs. Switzerland|
|Cameroon||43||Dec.2||Groups||Switzerland win vs. Serbia|
|Uruguay||14||Dec.2||Groups||Goals scored tiebreaker|
|Ghana||61||Dec.2||Groups||Loss vs. Uruguay|
|Germany||11||Dec.1||Groups||Goal difference tiebreaker|
|Costa Rica||31||Dec.1||Groups||Loss vs. Germany|
|Belgium||2||Dec.1||Groups||Draw vs. Croatia|
|Mexico||13||Nov.30||Groups||Goal difference tiebreaker|
|Saudi Arabia||51||Nov.30||Groups||Loss vs. Mexico|
|Tunisia||30||Nov.30||Groups||Win by Australia vs. Denmark|
|Denmark||10||Nov.30||Groups||Loss vs. Australia|
|Iran||20||Nov.29||Groups||Loss vs. USA|
|Wales||19||Nov.29||Groups||Loss vs. England|
|Ecuador||44||Nov.29||Groups||Loss vs. Senegal|
|Canada||41||Nov.27||Groups||Loss vs. Croatia AND Morocco win vs. Belgium|
|Qatar||50||Nov.25||Groups||Loss vs. Senegal AND NED-ECU draw|
MORE: Which team has won the most World Cups in history?
Is Jamaica still in the World Cup?
Jamaica’s World Cup run comes to an end. They have been a real surprise package on their first appearance at this tournament.
Are Brazil still in the World Cup?
More than a month has passed since Brazil were knocked out of the World Cup in Qatar by Croatia in the quarter-finals.
Is US out of World Cup 2023?
Jeff Carlisle, U.S. soccer correspondent Aug 9, 2023, 02:06 PM ET Close
Jeff Carlisle covers MLS and the U.S. national team for ESPN FC.
When Sweden eliminated the U.S. women’s national team from the 2023 Women’s World Cup on Sunday, it marked the end of an era. It had been 4,403 days since the Americans last felt the sting of World Cup elimination, that being the 2011 Women’s World Cup final against Japan,
Now, in a little less than two weeks, a new World Cup champion will be crowned. There was a certain inevitability about the USWNT’s demise, too – after all, no team wins forever. Yet the U.S. team’s World Cup exit felt more seismic, as if years of cracks appearing in the American game – poor performances in youth World Cups, the paucity of creative players, the wake-up call at the last Olympics, to name a few – suddenly became chasms, ending in a World Cup run that was far below the U.S.
team’s usual standard. So is the end of this era for the U.S. a harbinger of an even more severe backslide? Is the U.S. looking at no longer being a dominant force in the international game? That depends on one’s definition. Does “dominant” mean winning trophies or being a contender? Throughout its history, the USWNT was at least the latter, and the team won often enough to accomplish the former.
During the Americans’ spell as World Cup champions, they failed to win the gold medal at two Olympic games. This included a quarterfinal exit in 2016 to Sweden that bore an eerie resemblance – a defeat via a penalty shootout in a game that the Americans dominated – to Sunday’s encounter. The U.S. also went 16 years between World Cup wins in 1999 and 2015, but that was interspersed with three Olympic triumphs.
All of this points to the fact that there have been ebbs and flows to the U.S. team’s preeminence. The problem in 2023 is that with the exception of the Sweden game, the U.S. didn’t ever look like a contender, recording its worst finish at a major tournament.
The preceding Olympics weren’t much better even as the U.S. claimed a bronze medal, hence the doubts about where the U.S. is heading. – Women’s World Cup : Landing page | Schedule | Rosters | News – Stream on ESPN+: LaLiga, Bundesliga, more (U.S.) How the U.S. got to this point is, in some respects, down to its own success.
Even as it was winning World Cups and Olympic gold medals, the U.S. was setting a standard it wanted other countries to emulate. And that is precisely what more nations have done, albeit with their own twists. Investment at the club level (mostly in Europe) has increased, which has raised standards.
- Initially, that resulted in teams like England, the Netherlands and Spain rising through the ranks.
- Now, that impact is having a ripple effect in other countries like Colombia – which has eight players on its 23-player roster who play in Europe – as well as Morocco, which has 13 players in Europe, nine of them in France, England or Spain,
(Morocco have also financial backing from the royal family, which has focused on grassroots efforts to give young players a chance to develop.) There’s also the obvious fact that when teams rise up, others must fall. That was the case in this World Cup, with Brazil, Canada and Germany all failing to get out of the group stage. play 0:51 How much blame lies with Andonovski for USWNT’s World Cup failure? Luis Miguel Echegaray questions the tactics of head coach Vlatko Andonovski after the USWNT crashed out of the Women’s World Cup vs. Sweden. “Women are playing in countries that never had access to the game before,” said OL Reign GM Lesle Gallimore, who also has been a collegiate head coach and commissioner of a youth league.
“So it’s just the natural evolution of the sport and the world’s game. I’m not trying to sound whiny about it, but I do think when you step back from the pill of our early exit, and maybe people not enjoying the performance as much – I’m sad about it too – I am just as elated at the growth of the game globally and how much people are paying attention.” The increased investment has had an effect beyond just additional playing opportunities.
The number of teams that are more organized and skillful is higher than it’s ever been. The third group stage game, against Portugal, was a case in point: Portugal boasted a 56% to 44% possession edge in its 0-0 draw against the U.S., a game Portugal nearly won.
This has served to erode the historical U.S. advantages of fitness and athleticism. University of Virginia women’s head coach Steve Swanson served as Jill Ellis’ assistant on the United States’ World Cup-winning sides of 2015 and 2019. He is among those who don’t think the U.S. is a diminishing force, and warns against an overreaction to the Americans’ performance at this World Cup.
For example, it’s a small sample of games. Would the post-tournament conversation be the same if the U.S. had played better, but lost a quarterfinal to Japan? Or if players like Mal Swanson (no relation to Steve) or Catarina Macario had been available? For Swanson, it doesn’t matter how the team did.
- There are issues that need to be addressed and he wants a critical analysis of everything, from talent identification to how the player pipeline functions.
- You don’t want to miss the problems as opposed to the symptoms,” he said.
- One issue Steve Swanson notes is the kind of player the U.S.
- Is producing.
He estimates that because other national teams are so much fitter and more organized, there is 40% less space in which to operate than there was even five years ago. That puts an even greater premium on players who can make decisions and problem-solve in tight spaces.
- We aren’t going to out-athlete, out-compete and have a better mentality than these teams anymore,” Swanson said.
- That might have been good 20 years ago.
- It’s not now.
- I’m not saying that can’t be our bread and butter, or that it can’t give us an edge.
- But just because we’re fit, athletic and have a great mentality doesn’t guarantee wins, especially at that level.
There’s got to be much more of an onus on decision-making and the technical side. And those are things that we need to change throughout our different growth periods and phases.” In a country the size of the U.S., that won’t be easy, given that the “pay-to-play” system at the youth levels, and the emphasis on winning at the expense of skill, are entrenched. play 0:51 How much blame lies with Andonovski for USWNT’s World Cup failure? Luis Miguel Echegaray questions the tactics of head coach Vlatko Andonovski after the USWNT crashed out of the Women’s World Cup vs. Sweden. At present, not every National Women’s Soccer League ( NWSL ) team has a youth program.
- The league doesn’t have a homegrown player rule either, though that is in the works.
- In light of the abuse news that engulfed the NWSL over the past two years, the league has instead, quite rightly, been focusing on getting its on-field product and player safety systems right.
- But instituting homegrown initiatives would increase the number of ways to become a professional.
It wouldn’t be just a “college or bust” scenario, with a few high school outliers like Alyssa Thompson thrown in. “I think everyone has to be patient. It’s not something that we’re going to solve overnight,” Gallimore said. “I’m still a believer that there doesn’t have to be one linear route to wear the crest.
But I do think the pro game now has evolved. Our own league has evolved to the point where we have to have a presence in that space and what that looks like in developing a player who’s able to thrive as a professional.” All that said, the U.S. still has some exceptional players. The likes of Naomi Girma, Lindsey Horan and Sophia Smith form the basis of a talented group, while the Sweden game was a reminder that the U.S.
can still outplay one of the world’s best teams. It’s also worth noting that the U.S. system is helping to produce performers like Jamaica’s Khadija “Bunny” Shaw for other national teams. That’s why University of North Carolina women’s head coach Anson Dorrance, who managed the U.S.
to its first World Cup win in 1991, said he “isn’t in a panic” about what happened in New Zealand and Australia, pointing out that the eventual return of Mal Swanson and Macario is “going to completely change things.” “We’ve got a pipeline,” Dorrance said. “We’ve obviously got to solve problems in certain parts of the field.
We’ve got the population to solve those problems. So, I’m not worried about the soft pockets on the field for us, because I think those are going to be absolutely resolved.” play 1:13 Alex Morgan ‘not planning’ retirement after World Cup exit Alex Morgan says she has no immediate plans to retire after the USWNT was eliminated from the World Cup by Sweden. Despite the optimism for the future, the doubts raised at the past two major tournaments are hard to ignore.
For the U.S. to be in the conversation again when it comes to contending for trophies, changes need to be made in terms of how the U.S. does things, and those changes must go beyond who the next coach will be. The USSF is tasked with driving that change though there are doubts there too, especially after the development academy was shuttered in 2020.
“I just think our federation can’t change directions every time the people change,” Gallimore said. “I think they have to commit to something and really commit to it and do it. Do it in a real way that’s sustainable. That’s probably the sharpest way I can put it.” Most of those changes likely won’t happen in time for the Paris Olympics, which kick off in less than a year.
Can a team lose in the World Cup?
Answering Your Questions About the 2022 World Cup The World Cup is here. Yet there are still plenty of questions about how things will unfold as soccer moves to center stage over the month in Qatar. Here’s a primer. The World Cup, a quadrennial tournament pitting the best national soccer teams against each other for the title of world champion, is the most important sports event in the world. By The New York Times The World Cup has never been held on the Arabian Peninsula before, for good reason. The tournament opened on Nov.20, when Ecuador beat Qatar. concluded on Dec.2, with the field of 32 teams narrowed to 16. The knockout stage — with its win-or-go-home — ends with the final on Dec.18, when the winner gets a very heavy (and surprisingly small), Image The Argentina star Lionel Messi has said this will be his last World Cup. Credit. Ali Haider/EPA, via Shutterstock No. The World Cup usually takes place in July — or it did, until Qatar won the right to host it. Initially, Qatar said that it would go ahead and hold the tournament in its normal summer window, despite the fact that its temperatures can reach 120 degrees; it it could not do so with the help of cooling technology that did not, at the time, exist.
- In 2015, FIFA, soccer’s world governing body, eventually concluded that the summer temperatures might have unpleasant consequences for fans and players — sluggishness, heat stroke, death, etc.
- And agreed to to the relatively bearable months of November and December. No.
- Temperatures in Qatar are generally in the 80s, and so not unlike those at a traditional World Cup.
(Have you been to Manaus, Brazil, in July?) But organizers have tried to get around this unpleasant state of affairs by installing systems meant to in seven of Qatar’s eight outdoor stadiums to a manageable 68 degrees. Oh, the leagues grumbled. A lot. The switch has disrupted not only league competitions globally, but also the lucrative Champions League, soccer’s richest club competition, and it has already led to earlier starts to seasons, compressed schedules and much hand-wringing.
- It also means that Fox Sports, which paid hundreds of millions of dollars for the broadcast rights in the United States, will have to wedge in a month of soccer games around another fall sport that tends to demand attention that time of year.
- Ever heard of the ? It is true that Qatar is tiny; at 4,416 square miles, it is and by far the smallest nation ever to host the World Cup.
All the games will take place in a tight circle of eight stadiums in and around the capital, Doha, making it the most compact World Cup in history. The Al Bayt World Cup stadium was built to resemble a desert tent. Credit. Darko Bandic/Associated Press Stadium 974 is made of shipping containers, and built to be disassembled.
Credit. David Ramos/Getty Images The field began with 32. Qatar qualified automatically as the host, and after years of matches — including a few bonus months, thanks to the coronavirus pandemic — the other 31 teams earned the right to come and play. (That number will increase to 48 teams in 2026, at the next World Cup, which will be held across the considerably larger real estate of Mexico, Canada and the United States.) The women have their own World Cup.
The next one is in 2023 and will take place in Australia and New Zealand. They’ve already for that one. It is an American burden, or an example of American exceptionalism, to call the sport by a different word from almost every other country in the English-speaking world.
Americans have their own game of football, of course, but for the purposes of the World Cup, you are allowed to say “football” instead of “soccer.” What you should not do is tell other people what they can call it. That just makes you a jerk. Go for it. But if you’re an American, don’t be surprised if people start moving away from you in the bar.
Qatar spent a decade, and more than $220 billion, on projects that remade the country ahead of the World Cup. Credit. Jewel Samad/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images The are divided into, designated by the letters A through H. In the tournament-opening group stage, each team plays all the other teams in its group once.
The top two finishers in each group advance to the round of 16, so losing one game at this stage does not eliminate a team. But after that, the World Cup is a, (The group stage is now over, and the knockout stage has begun.) Three points are awarded for a win, one for a draw and none for a loss. That can lead to teams within the same group finishing with the same number of points.
() If there is a tie within the group, you will be introduced to the glorious tiebreaking concept of goal difference. That’s the difference between the number of goals a team scores and the number it has allowed, so a blowout win (or defeat) can be great insurance or a crippling disaster.
If points or goal difference doesn’t break a tie in a group, there are even more complications. Don’t worry about those for now. (Goal differential is listed as “GD” in our,) The tournament is being broadcast on Fox and FS1 in English, and on Telemundo in Spanish. You can livestream it on Peacock (in Spanish), or on streaming services that carry Fox and FS1, like Sling TV, Fubo and Vidgo.
Or you can follow along on social media services like Twitter, if it’s still in business. Qatar is three hours ahead of London, eight hours ahead of New York and 11 hours ahead of Los Angeles. That meant some predawn kickoffs on the East Coast of the United States earlier in the tournament.
But for the remainder of the knockout stage, all the games start at either 10 a.m. or 2 p.m. Eastern time. And don’t worry about long pregame shows where you tune in at the announced game time and the studio crew talks for 25 minutes: At the World Cup, the games will kick off when FIFA’s schedule says they will kick off.
Each half is 45 minutes, although the referee generally adds a few minutes on at the end of each to account for time lost to injuries and such. In between the halves there is 15 minutes for halftime. The whole thing is over in less than two hours, a lot shorter than a typical baseball or (American) football game.
But the games could get longer in the knockout stage, because there cannot be any ties. If a match is tied after 90 minutes, 30 minutes more is played. If the score is still tied, the teams have a shootout with five penalty kicks each to determine the winner. It’s confusing, but, with helpful pictures.
Switzerland’s team arriving at the Doha airport before the tournament. Credit. Laurent Gillieron/EPA, via Shutterstock Before the tournament began, Brazil, France, England and Spain were the oddsmakers’ top choices, followed by Argentina, Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands.
- Germany and Belgium,) No, Italy failed to qualify for the second consecutive cycle, even though the Italians are the reigning European champions after winning in 2021. Whoops.
- Yes, it is.
- Sweden, Nigeria, Chile and Colombia all failed to qualify.
- And Russia, which reached the quarterfinals as the host in 2018, was by FIFA after it invaded Ukraine this year.
After the humiliation of failing to qualify for the 2018 tournament, the Americans returned with a new generation of players. They successfully navigated the group stage with, a and a, But they, in the round of 16, ending their World Cup. At each World Cup, one of the groups is informally designated the Group of Death, meaning that it has the strongest teams and thus they will theoretically be engaged in a kind of gladiatorial struggle.
No consensus has emerged this time around. And anyway, no one dies in the end, so maybe we should stop using that term. Fame, glory and the adoration of your country are one sort of reward. But there is also a huge pile of cash. This year, the winning team will take home $42 million, part of a $440 million prize pool.
How much of that will actually go to the individual players is another story.
Meanwhile, the United States women’s team because of new labor rules and prize-money splits.They appear to be practicing something called,This signifies that “you know you messed up,” said Jessica Tracy, a professor of psychology at the University of British Columbia.
A correction was made on : An earlier version of this article misstated the date of the U.S. team’s first game in the World Cup. It is Nov.21, not June 21. A correction was made on : An earlier version of this article referred incorrectly to Russia’s performance in the 2018 World Cup.
- It reached the quarterfinals, not the semifinals.
- A correction was made on : An earlier version of this article misstated the time difference between London and Qatar.
- It is three hours, not five hours.
- A correction was made on : A picture caption with an earlier version of this article misstated how much Qatar had spent on projects ahead of the World Cup.
It was more than $220 billion, not $220 million. How we handle corrections is a writer at large, working for a variety of desks including Sports, Culture, Media and International. Previously she was a correspondent in the London bureau, and a reporter for the Culture and Metro desks.
Joined The Times in 2006. An assistant editor in Sports, he helps direct coverage of soccer, the Olympics and international sports. A version of this article appears in print on, Section B, Page 8 of the New York edition with the headline: In Case You Know Next to Nil About What Some People Call Football,
| | : Answering Your Questions About the 2022 World Cup
What teams are disqualified World Cup 2023?
News The 13th edition of the tournament will be the first without the two-time champions West Indies will not be going to the World Cup in India this year • ICC via Getty Images West Indies have failed to qualify for the 2023 ODI World Cup after losing to Scotland in the Super Six stage of the ongoing World Cup Qualifiers in Zimbabwe. Only the two finalists of that tournament make it to the World Cup in India later this year, and West Indies now can’t reach the final.
- They were champions of the first two World Cups in 1975 and 1979, and runners-up in 1983; the 13th edition of the competition will be the first without the team from the Caribbean.
- West Indies had to play the World Cup Qualifiers because they finished ninth in the ODI Super League, and only the top eight teams gain direct entry to the ten-team tournament.
They were grouped with Zimbabwe, Netherlands, USA and Nepal in Group A of the Qualifiers, and the format of the tournament was such that the top three teams from each of the two groups made it to the Super Six stage. However, the teams that progressed would carry forward points earned from their results against the other teams that also qualified from their group.
- West Indies began the Qualifiers with victories against USA and Nepal but then lost to Zimbabwe and Netherlands,
- So while they qualified for the Super Six, it meant they took zero points into that round, while Zimbabwe carried forward four points and Netherlands two.
- From Group B, Sri Lanka qualified for the Super Six with four points, Scotland with two, and Oman with none.
Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka then won their first Super Six matches, taking their tally to six points each. It left West Indies needing to win all three of their games – against Scotland, Sri Lanka and Oman – to have a chance of catching up to Zimbabwe or Sri Lanka.
But with the defeat to Scotland, the maximum West Indies can get to is four points – not enough for the top-two finish needed for a World Cup ticket to India. This setback is a continuation of West Indies’ decline in the limited-overs format. They only just made it to the 2019 ODI World Cup in England, via the World Cup Qualifiers, where they sneaked into the final at the expense of, coincidentally, Scotland in a rain-hit game.
They then did not qualify for the Super 12 stage of the 2022 T20 World Cup in Australia, after winning just one (against Zimbabwe) and losing two (to Scotland and Ireland) of their group matches.
Who won the Golden Boot 2023 World Cup?
Japan’s Miyazawa Hinata won the Golden Boot thanks to her five goals in the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023 in Australia and New Zealand. Get the list of top scorers. (2023 Getty Images) The FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023 in Australia and New Zealand included a total of 32 top national football teams, each with 23 players in their squads. The Golden Boot for the tournament’s top goalscorer went to Miyazawa Hinata (pictured) despite her Japan side going out in the quarter-finals.
- Miyazawa scored five goals including two in the opening 5-0 win over Zambia, and two more in their final group game in which they beat eventual champions Spain 4-0.
- France’s Kadidiatou Diani was second on four goals with her two assists putting her ahead of Amanda Ilestedt of Sweden.
- Most assists was the first tiebreaker for players who scored the same number of goals.
If that did not separate the players, then lowest minutes played decided who came out on top. The 2019 edition was won by Megan Rapinoe of the United States Women’s National Team (USWNT), who scored six goals at the tournament in France. The table below shows all players who scored at least two goals in the competition.
Check out the full schedule of the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023 World at their Feet – Our Original Series about footballers and their journey to the top – Stream now for free
Has Brazil won World Cup?
Most FIFA World Cup wins: Know the most successful football nations The first football FIFA World Cup for men was held in 1930 while the women’s tournament debuted in 1991. (2002 Getty Images) The FIFA World Cup is the most prestigious competition in world, with the best national teams from across the globe competing for the honour every four years. Initially, only men’s teams competed at the quadrennial showpiece. The women’s FIFA World Cup was introduced in 1991. Uruguay won the first World Cup held in 1930, beating Argentina 4-2 in the final. (Getty Images) The men’s Brazil football team has the most FIFA World Cup wins, Brazil have lifted the World Cup a record five times – 1958, 1962, 1970, 1994 and 2002. They are also the only team to compete in all 21 editions.
- Nicknamed ‘ La Selecao ‘, Brazil are also the most successful men’s team in the World Cup in terms of matches played (109), matches won (73) and goals scored (229).
- When Brazil won the title for the first time in 1958, legendary striker Pele came to the fore.
- He scored six goals in that edition, including two in the final against Sweden.
During his illustrious career, Pele went on to win three FIFA World Cups – 1958, 1962 and 1970 – and remains the only player to achieve this feat to date. Brazilian legend Pele is the only player to win the FIFA World Cup three times. (Getty Images) Hot on the heels of Brazil in the list of most FIFA World Cup wins are Germany and Italy, winning the trophy four times each. While Germany won it in 1954, 1974, 1990 and 2014, Italy were the champions in 1934, 1938, 1982 and 2006.
- Germany’s run in the World Cup can be divided into three periods, Germany pre World War II, West Germany and the present-day reunified Germany.
- However, all three are considered one nation in the record books.
- The European giants have also finished among the top three a record 12 times, including four second-place finishes.
Former German striker Miroslav Klose holds the record for the most number of goals scored at the FIFA World Cup, netting 16 goals across four editions. Germany players celebrate their first World Cup triumph in 1954. (1954 Getty Images)
- Italy, meanwhile, lifted the World Cup on their debut in 1934 and successfully defended it in 1938, becoming the first team to win back-to-back titles.
- Despite being one of the most successful teams, Italy failed to qualify for the FIFA World Cups in 2018 and 2022.
- The other nations to win the FIFA World Cup more than once are Argentina (3), France (2) and Uruguay (2).
While Argentina triumphed in 1978, 1986 and 2022, Uruguay were victorious in 1930 and 1950. France won it in 1998 and 2018.
- The Netherlands have reached the final thrice – 1974, 1978 and 2010 – but are yet to add their name to the World Cup winner’s list.
- Only teams from Europe and South America have won the men’s FIFA World Cup.
- In the women’s FIFA World Cup, the USA are the most successful nation, winning the title four times in eight editions and have never finished outside the top three.
The USA women’s football team won the FIFA Women’s World Cup in 1991, 1999, 2015 and 2019. They have also scored the most number of goals (138) at the global showpiece.
How did Jamaica beat Brazil
Soccer Football – FIFA Women’s World Cup Australia and New Zealand 2023 – Group F – Jamaica v Brazil – Melbourne Rectangular Stadium, Melbourne, Australia – August 2, 2023 Brazil’s Debinha in action REUTERS/Asanka Brendon Ratnayake Acquire Licensing Rights MELBOURNE, Aug 2 (Reuters) – A courageous Jamaica held Brazil to a 0-0 draw on Wednesday to reach the knockout phase for the first time in only their second Women’s World Cup while condemning the South Americans to their earliest exit since 1995.
Needing a point to go through, the Reggae Girlz barely threatened to score but were tight in defence, repelling wave after wave of Brazilian attacks in a frenetic atmosphere at Melbourne Rectangular Stadium. At the final whistle, the overwhelmed Jamaicans slumped to their knees and roared in joy before forming a circle to dance and sway to the Bob Marley song “One Love”.
Having lost all their matches in France four years ago, the Jamaicans have come a long way in a short time. They held France 0-0 and beat Panama 1-0, finishing second in Group F behind the French while advancing courtesy of a single goal. “I feel like we’ve been hugely underestimated,” said goalkeeper Becky Spencer, who won the player of the match award after her third clean sheet of the tournament.
- I don’t think anyone took us seriously.
- We’re resilient and we had a point to prove.” Brazil, who needed three points, were left to lament a slew of missed chances in a dismal end to Marta’s sixth and final World Cup.
- They (Jamaica) did a good job and we weren’t able to make many chances,” stone-faced coach Pia Sundhage told reporters.
“When we could not break the defence, you get a little bit stressed. And if you get stressed, it was a little bit slow and you lose a little bit of the courage.” Sundhage started 37-year-old Marta on the field for the first time in the tournament but the iconic forward was unable to inspire her team and her touch deserted her twice in front of goal early.
She fired a shot into a defender in the fourth minute and then blew another good opportunity seven minutes later with a heavy touch, leaving unmarked team mate Ary Borges fuming at the far post. Charging towards goal, Borges finally had her chance when Luana found her with a cross but the playmaker steered her header well wide in the 24th minute.
Borges then set Tamires up with a delightful cross into the inside-left channel late in the half but she thumped a volley straight at Spencer. Jamaica rode their luck to halftime and Brazil’s desperation grew after the break as their attacks came to nothing.
Jamaicans hearts were in mouths in the 79th minute when defender Allyson Swaby nearly put the ball into her own net with a terrible attempted clearance that forced Spencer into a fine save at the far post. In search of a goal, the Brazilians exposed themselves to the counter-attack and Khadija Shaw all but made them pay.
Needing only the keeper to beat, she blazed just over the bar in the 82nd minute. Brazil had one last chance in a final-minute goal-mouth scramble but Debinha headed straight to the keeper, allowing the Jamaicans to celebrate arguably their finest moment in international football.
Is Colombia still in the World Cup?
Colombia exit World Cup but fans and memories remain – DW – 08/12/2023.
Why did Brazil lose to Jamaica?
KEY MOMENTS – With Marta starting the match for the first time in the group stage, Brazil maintained possession for most of the first half but struggled to test Jamaica goalkeeper Rebecca Spencer. The second half saw Brazil lift the tempo as the team chased the goal needed to advance.
Brazil recorded six shots on target but struggled to threaten Jamaica’s goal as Jamaica’s organized defense stifled the team throughout the game. Marta was replaced after 80 minutes with the game still in the balance. A free kick from Andressa and a header from Debinha in stoppage time represented Brazil’s closest chance of scoring the winning goal.
It was close, but close enough.
Has any team ever been kicked out of the World Cup
Mexico – 1990 World Cup – Mexico missed out on the 1990 FIFA World Cup Although the senior team had nothing to do with the result, Mexico’s management needed to take a real look at themselves after the team was disqualified from the 1990 FIFA World Cup.
- The decision was taken after it was found that some of their players were over the age limit, stated by FIFA, in the qualifiers for the 1989 FIFA World Youth Championship which came to be known as the “Cachirules” scanda l.
- It was first thought that only the youth team would face the consequences until later when FIFA decided to impose it on all Mexican national sides playing in FIFA tournaments.
The surprising thing is that FIFA had issued a warning earlier that year regarding the age limit and urged the sides not to try and deceive the governing body. That really says a lot about how serious FIFA were on that front. The youth side secured first place in the group stage, booking their place in the FIFA World Youth Championship, including a 9-0 victory over Guyana.