Who Won The World Cup In 1990?

Answer The Question

Which country won World Cup 1990

1990 FIFA World Cup

Coppa del Mondo Italia ’90 ( Italian )
Tournament details
Host country	Italy
Dates	8 June – 8 July
Teams	24 (from 5 confederations)
Venue(s)	12 (in 12 host cities)
Final positions
Champions	West Germany (3rd title)
Runners-up	Argentina
Third place	Italy
Fourth place	England
Tournament statistics
Matches played	52
Goals scored	115 (2.21 per match)
Attendance	2,516,215 (48,389 per match)
Top scorer(s)	Salvatore Schillaci (6 goals)
Best player(s)	Salvatore Schillaci
Best young player	Robert Prosinečki
Fair play award	England
← 1986 1994 →

The 1990 FIFA World Cup was the 14th FIFA World Cup, a quadrennial football tournament for men’s senior national teams. It was held from 8 June to 8 July 1990 in Italy, the second country to host the event for a second time (the first being Mexico in 1986 ).

1. Teams representing 116 national football associations entered and qualification began in April 1988.22 teams qualified from this process, along with host nation Italy and defending champions Argentina,
2. The tournament was won by West Germany, for the third time.
3. They beat defending champions Argentina 1–0 at the Stadio Olimpico in Rome, a rematch of the previous final four years earlier.

Italy finished third and England fourth, after both lost their semi-finals in penalty shootouts, This was the last tournament to feature a team from West Germany, with the country being reunified with East Germany a few months later in October, as well as teams from the Eastern Bloc prior to the end of the Cold War in 1991, as the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia teams made last appearances.

• Costa Rica, Ireland and the United Arab Emirates made their first appearances in the finals.
• As of 2022, this was the last time the United Arab Emirates qualified for a FIFA World Cup finals.
• The official match ball was the Adidas Etrusco Unico,
• The standards for Cameroon were not high and many people thought they would lose in the group stage.

Instead, they topped their group, shocking defending champions Argentina with a 1-0 victory, and defeated Romania 2-1 and qualified, although they lost 4-0 to the Soviet Union in their last group stage match. They went on to defeat Colombia 2-1 in the Round of 16, becoming the first African country to reach the World Cup Quarterfinals, before losing 3-2 to England,

The 1990 World Cup is widely regarded as one of the poorest World Cups in terms of the games. It generated an average 2.21 goals per game – a record low that still stands – and a then-record 16 red cards, including the first dismissal in a final. The tournament also had a significant lasting influence on the game as a whole.

In England, the team’s success in this tournament led to the resurgence of the domestic top-flight, which had suffered from violence on the pitch and hooliganism by spectators throughout the 1980s. It saw the introduction of the pre-match Fair Play Flag (then inscribed with “Fair Play Please”) to encourage fair play.

Overly defensive tactics of many teams led to the introduction of the back-pass rule in 1992 and three points for a win instead of two, both of which have encouraged attacking play, increasing spectator interest in the sport. The tournament also produced some of the World Cup’s best remembered moments and stories, including the emergence of African nations, in addition to what has become the World Cup soundtrack: ” Nessun dorma “.

The 1990 World Cup stands as one of the most watched events in television history, garnering an estimated 26.69 billion non-unique viewers over the course of the tournament. This was the first World Cup to be officially recorded and transmitted in HDTV by the Italian broadcaster RAI in association with Japan’s NHK,

Where was World Cup held 1990?

The 1990 FIFA World Cup held in Italy was a monumental event that captivated football fans around the globe. This tournament showcased thrilling matches, memorable goals, and iconic performances that have etched their place in football history. From the intense rivalries on the pitch to the dramatic moments that unfolded, the 1990 World Cup left an indelible mark on the sport.

Let us delve into the highlights and key aspects of this extraordinary tournament. The tournament kicked off on June 8, 1990, with matches played across various cities in Italy. A total of 24 teams from different nations competed in their quest for football glory. The tournament featured notable teams and legendary players, each bringing their unique style and strategies to the field.

Teams: Austria, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, England, Italy (hosts), Netherlands, Republic of Irelan, Romania, Scotland, Soviet Union, Spain, Sweden, West Germany, Yugoslavia, Costa Rica, United States, Argentina (holders), Brazil, Colombia, Uruguay, South Korea, United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Cameroon. Ciao, a stick figure in the colors of the Italy Tricolore, was the mascot for the 1990 FIFA World Cup. The 1990 World Cup witnessed numerous memorable matches that left fans on the edge of their seats. From the iconic clash between Argentina and Italy in the semifinals to the thrilling final between West Germany and Argentina, the tournament was filled with excitement and drama. Olympic Stadium, 1990 One of the standout moments of the tournament was the remarkable performance of Cameroon. They emerged as the surprise package of the tournament, defeating defending champions Argentina in a memorable opening match. Their fearless style of play and underdog spirit captivated the world. World Cup’s Greatest Shocks: Cameroon 1-0 Argentina, 1990 The 1990 World Cup also showcased the brilliance of several football legends. One such standout player was Salvatore Schillaci, an Italian forward, who emerged as the tournament’s top scorer with six goals. His electrifying performances earned him the Golden Boot award and made him a national hero in Italy. Salvatore Schillaci, 1990 Other notable players who left their mark on the tournament include Lothar Matthäus of West Germany, Diego Maradona and Goycochea of Argentina, and Roger Milla of Cameroon. These players displayed exceptional skill, leadership, and game-changing abilities, contributing to the tournament’s overall excitement. Goycochea and Maradona, 1990 Roger Milla, Flag Dance, 1990 The first semi-final featured the host nation, Italy, and the world champions, Argentina in Naples. ‘Toto’ Schillaci scored yet again to put Italy ahead in the 17th minute, but Claudio Caniggia equalized midway through the second half, breaking Walter Zenga’s clean sheet streak throughout the tournament.

There were no more goals in the 90 minutes or in extra time despite Maradona (who played for Naples in Serie A at the time) showing glimpses of magic, but there was a sending-off: Ricardo Giusti of Argentina was shown the red card in the 13th minute of extra time. Argentina went through on penalties, winning the shoot-out 4–3 after more heroics from Goycochea.

The semi-final between West Germany and England at Juventus’ home stadium in Turin was goalless at half-time. Then, in the 60th minute, a free-kick tapped to Andreas Brehme resulted in a shot that was deflected off Paul Parker into his own net. England equalized with ten minutes left; Gary Lineker was the scorer.

The game ended 1–1. Extra time yielded more chances. Klinsmann was guilty of two glaring misses and both sides struck a post. England had another Platt goal disallowed for offside. The match went to penalties, and West Germany went on to win the shoot-out 4–3. The two matches had the exact same score at 1–1, an identical penalty shootout score at 4–3, and the same order of penalties scored.3rd Place: The game saw three goals in a 15-minute spell near the end of the match.

Roberto Baggio opened the scoring after a mistake by England’s goalkeeper Peter Shilton, in his final game before international retirement, presented a simple opportunity. A header by David Platt leveled the game 10 minutes later but Schillaci was fouled in the penalty area five minutes later, leading to a penalty.

Schillaci himself got up to convert the kick to win him the tournament’s Golden Boot for his six-goal tally. Nicola Berti had a goal ruled out minutes later, but the hosts claimed third place. England had the consolation prize of the Fair Play award, having received no red cards and the lowest average number of yellows per match.

The final between West Germany and Argentina has been cited as the most cynical and lowest-quality of all World Cup Finals. In the 65th minute, Argentina’s Pedro Monzon – himself only recently on as a substitute – was sent off for a foul on Jürgen Klinsmann. Lothar Matthäus and Maradona 1990 Argentina, weakened by suspension and injury, offered little attacking threat throughout a contest dominated by the West Germans, who struggled to create many clear goalscoring opportunities. The only goal of the contest arrived in the 85th minute when Mexican referee Edgardo Codesal awarded a dubious penalty to West Germany, after a foul on Rudi Völler by Roberto Sensini leading to Argentinian protests.

• Andreas Brehme converted the spot kick to settle the contest.
• In the closing moments, Argentina was reduced to nine after Gustavo Dezotti, who had already been given a yellow card earlier in the match, received a red card when he hauled Jürgen Kohler to the ground during a stoppage in play.
• The 1–0 scoreline provided another first: Argentina was the first team to fail to score in a World Cup Final.

With its third title (and three second-place finishes) West Germany – in its final tournament before national reunification – became the most successful World Cup nation at the time along with Italy and Brazil (also won three titles each then). West German manager Franz Beckenbauer became the first man to both captains (in 1974) and manage a World Cup-winning team, and only the second man (after Mário Zagallo of Brazil) to win the World Cup as a player and as team manager. Winner: West Germany 1990 The 1990 World Cup left a lasting impact on the sport of football. It showcased the importance of teamwork, individual brilliance, and tactical prowess. The tournament also marked the end of an era, as it was the last World Cup for legendary players like Gary Lineker, who had graced the global stage for years.

The tournament generated a record-low goals-per-game average and a then-record of 16 red cards were handed out. In the knockout stage, many teams played defensively for 120 minutes, with the intention of trying their luck in the penalty shoot-out, rather than risk going forward. Two exceptions were the eventual champions West Germany and hosts Italy, the only teams to win three of their four knockout matches in standard time.

There were four penalty shoot-outs, a record equaled with 2006, 2014, and 2018 tournaments, until it was surpassed by the 2022 tournament, with five. Eight matches went to extra time, also a record tied with the 2014 tournament. Losing finalists Argentina were prime examples of this trend of cautious defensive play, choosing to do so because 3 of their best players were left off the squad due to injury.

1. They scored only five goals in the entire tournament (a record low for a finalist).
2. Argentina also became the first team to advance twice on penalty shoot-outs and the first team to fail to score and have a player sent off in a World Cup final.
3. As a result of this trend, FIFA introduced the back-pass rule in time for the 1994 tournament to make it harder for teams to time-waste by repeatedly passing the ball back for their goalkeepers to pick up.

Three, rather than two points would be awarded for victories at future tournaments to help further encourage attacking play. Lothar Matthäus 1990 The 1990 FIFA World Cup stands as a testament to the power of football to unite nations, inspire generations, and create lifelong memories. From the thrilling matches to the unforgettable performances, this tournament exemplified the essence of the beautiful game.

Have the Dutch won a World Cup?

History of the Netherlands national football team

This article needs to be updated, Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. ( December 2019 )

Aspect of history Netherlands Oranje HollandClockwork Orange The Flying Dutchmen La Naranja Mecanica Association (KNVB)Confederation (Europe)Most (133)Top scorer (50) Previous top scorers

• (40)
• (37)
• (35)
• (33)
• (28)

Home stadium (51,117) (53,052) (36,000) Previous home stadiums

• (64,000)
• (30,000)
• (20,000)
• (24,500)
• (22,000)
• (30,000)

Highest1 (August 2011 – September 2011)Lowest25 (May 1998)First international 1–4 Netherlands (, ; 30 April 1905)Appearances10 ( first in )Best result Runners-up,, and Appearances10 ( first in )Best resultWinners, The history of the Netherlands national football team began when the Netherlands played their first international match on 30 April 1905 in Antwerp against,

1. The game went into extra time, in which the Dutch scored three times, making the score 4–1 for the Dutch side, winning the,
2. The made its first appearance at the in,,
3. The Dutch hold the record for playing the most World Cup finals without ever winning the tournament.
4. They finished second in the, and World Cups, losing to, and respectively.

They won the in,

Did Germany win the World Cup in 1990?

Summary – An example of the Adidas Etrusco Unico ball used in the match Players of Argentina before the match: Juan Simón, goalkeeper Sergio Goycochea and Diego Maradona The 1990 final is often cited as one of the most cynical and ugliest World Cup finals. It was an ill-tempered game, notable for the first two sendings off in a World Cup final.

• Ian Morrison wrote “the game did little for football but there was one consolation: Had the Argentines lifted the World Cup – with two wins and five goals in their seven matches – it would have been a catastrophe for the game.
• At least their awful approach to Italia ’90 had gone unrewarded.” The West Germany team attacked relentlessly from the beginning of the match.

In the 3rd minute, Rudi Völler, who had been forced off with a leg injury in the semi-final against England, had the first clear-cut opportunity to score from close range following a free-kick cross by Andreas Brehme, but his off-balance toe punt went off target.

1. West Germany won another free kick in a more dangerous position two minutes later when Pierre Littbarski was fouled in the penalty arc,
2. Brehme’s shot hit the wall and Klaus Augenthaler ‘s follow-up long-range strike was saved by Argentine goalkeeper Sergio Goycochea,
3. In the 8th and 12th minutes, Völler’s header and Littbarski’s curl shot went high and wide of the goal, respectively.

In the 13th minute, Völler failed to receive Brehme’s outswinging cross, and the ball supposedly struck the arm of the Argentina defender Oscar Ruggeri, The Mexican referee Edgardo Codesal refused to award a penalty kick despite Jürgen Klinsmann ‘s appealing for handball.

• Five minutes later, Völler appeared to be taken down in the Argentine penalty area, but Codesal indicated to play on.
• In the 23rd minute, West German captain Lothar Matthäus ‘s cross found Völler and his header was again wide of the target.
• In the 38th minute, Argentina gained a dangerous free kick when José Basualdo was fouled by Guido Buchwald,

Argentina’s captain Diego Maradona ‘s kick went up and over the wall but couldn’t dip back to be on target. At half-time, the score was still level at 0-0. The West Germans had a few chances at the start of the second half. Littbarski cut inside, dribbling past three South American defenders, but his shot from outside the box went just wide.

Later, Thomas Berthold and Rudi Völler, respectively, failed to capitalize from dangerous free kicks taken by Andreas Brehme. In the 58th minute, Argentine goalkeeper Sergio Goycochea appeared to take down Klaus Augenthaler inside the penalty area, but the referee Edgardo Codesal again refused to award a penalty kick.

Pedro Monzón had the distinction of being the first player to be sent off at a FIFA World Cup final, after being shown a straight red card for a reckless studs up challenge on Jürgen Klinsmann; FIFA had warned its officials to enforce the rules and Monzón had raised his foot during the tackle, a foul that Klinsmann claims left a 15-centimetre (6 in) gash on his shin.

• In the 78th minute, after an incorrectly given corner kick, West German captain Matthäus lost the ball inside his own penalty area and then appeared to trip Gabriel Calderón,
• Codesal once again said to play on, amid penalty shouts from the Argentinian midfielder.
• Six minutes from full time, Codesal incurred the wrath of the Argentinians after awarding West Germany a questionable penalty kick for Roberto Sensini ‘s sliding tackle on Völler.

Regular penalty taker Matthäus had been forced to replace his boots during the match and did not feel comfortable in the new ones, so Andreas Brehme took his place and converted the spot kick with a low, right-footed shot to the goalkeeper’s right. Gustavo Dezotti, already cautioned in the first half, received a straight red card late in the match when he hauled down Jürgen Kohler with what The New York Times described as a “neck tackle right out of professional wrestling”, after Kohler refused to give-up the ball in an alleged attempt to waste time.

• After dismissing Dezotti, Codesal was surrounded and jostled by the rest of the Argentinian team, with Maradona receiving a yellow card for dissent.
• At the final whistle, Maradona, who was man marked by Guido Buchwald for almost the entire match, burst into tears and blamed the referee for the loss.
• Argentina entered the game with four players suspended and ended it with nine men on the field, overall losing over half their squad due to injury or suspension.

In total, West Germany had 16 scoring chances out of 23 shots. German head coach Franz Beckenbauer said “There were no doubts whatsoever who was going to win. For 90 minutes we attacked Argentina and there was no feeling of any danger that a goal would be scored against us.

1. As I saw it, we outplayed them from beginning to end.” Beckenbauer said that the penalty “was not the key to the game because in any case we would have scored, even if it had taken overtime.1–0 by a penalty doesn’t give a fair idea of this game.
2. We could have won, 3–0.
3. I don’t remember a single chance Argentina had to score a goal.” Argentina became the competition’s first finalist not to score, with only one shot on goal.

The South Americans failed to put together a coherent attacking strategy and lost the ball frequently. Instead, they focused on defending at all costs, knowing they would have the advantage if they managed to reach the penalty shoot-out, as they had already advanced twice in the tournament by this means.

At the time, the 1990 final was the lowest-scoring final in the history of the competition—although this record was broken four years later, when Brazil beat Italy on penalties after 120 goalless minutes. The 1990 victory gave West Germany their third FIFA World Cup title, also making them the team to have played in the most FIFA World Cup finals at the time (three wins, three defeats), as well as avenging their defeat at the hands of Argentina in the previous final,

It also meant that Germany coach Franz Beckenbauer became the only person to have won both silver and gold medals at the World Cup as a player ( 1966, 1974 ) and as a coach (1986, 1990), and he also won a bronze medal as a player (1970). Having won on penalties against England in the semi-finals, West Germany became the first team to had won on that method en route to the title.

Has Cameroon ever won Argentina?

Background – The 1990 World Cup was a first for many, as well as the last. list of 4 items list 1 of 4 list 2 of 4 list 3 of 4 list 4 of 4 end of list On the political and geographical side, it would be the last World Cup for West Germany as the country would unify with East Germany a few months later and play all subsequent tournaments as Germany.

• The USSR also played its last World Cup as a union before its dissolution the following year.
• Italy were one of the favourites to win the tournament, along with Argentina, England and West Germany.
• Costa Rica, the Republic of Ireland and the United Arab Emirates made their debut, while Egypt and the United States made their return after a long absence.

Previous finalists France failed to qualify. The tournament kicked off with one of the biggest upsets in its history: Cameroon, playing only their second World Cup, beat defending champions Argentina 1-0. They then went on to beat Romania and qualified for the knockouts.

Argentina advanced as well but as one of the third-placed teams.Cameroon and the Republic of Ireland were the shock qualifiers for the quarterfinals, as Brazil, the Netherlands and Uruguay were knocked out.Both semifinals were decided on penalty shootouts, resulting in heartbreak and tears for Italy (4-3 loss to Argentina) and England (4-3 loss to West Germany).

The final failed to live up to the occasion as both teams deployed defensive tactics. The first red card of a World Cup final was shown to Argentina’s Pedro Monzon in the 65th minute. Despite facing a weakened side for the rest of the match, West Germany failed to threaten the Argentinian goal.

What happened to Brazil in 1990 World Cup?

Brazil at the 1990 FIFA World Cup Matches of the Brazil national football team in the 1990 FIFA World Cup

You can help expand this article with text translated from in Portuguese, (March 2022) Click for important translation instructions. a machine-translated version of the Portuguese article. Machine translation, like or, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Consider to this template: there are already 1,449 articles in the, and specifying |topic= will aid in categorization. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide in the accompanying your translation by providing an to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Portuguese Wikipedia article at ]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template } to the, For more guidance, see,

The played in the, and continued to maintained their record of being the only team to enter every World Cup Finals. The team was coached by and the captain was, a defender from, The Brazilian team used the for the first time in its history and ended up in 9th place. Brazil played until the Last 16 stage, where they were defeated by,

Who knocked England out of the 1990 World Cup?

England lose the decisive penalty shoot-out 4-3 against West Germany in the World Cup semi-final. Gary Lineker, Peter Beardsley and David Platt scored the first three penalties for England, but Stuart Pearce and Chris Waddle failed to convert their kicks, sending Bobby’s Robson’s team crashing out of the competition.

How many World Cup did Germany won?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Germany celebrating victory in the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil This is a record of the Men’s Germany and West Germany’s results at the FIFA World Cup, For Germany ‘s World Cup history, FIFA considers only the teams managed by the Deutscher Fußball-Bund, comprising three periods: Germany (during Nazi era), West Germany and reunified Germany,

The Mens Germany national football team is one of the most successful national teams at the FIFA World Cup, winning four titles, earning second-place and third-place finishes four times each and one fourth-place finish. Germany’s 12 podium finishes (3rd place or better) in 20 tournaments add up to at least three more than any other nation.

In addition, Germany are the only team which has stood on the podium at least once during the completed decades in which at least one tournament was held (1930s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010s). Along with Argentina, Brazil and Spain, they are one of the four national teams to win outside their continental confederation, with the title of the 2014 FIFA World Cup in South America.

• The team qualified for every FIFA World Cup tournament they have entered (20 out of the 22), the second most frequent, and only failed to reach the quarter-finals three times, in 1938, 2018, and 2022,
• With this, Germany’s 8th place or better (quarter-finals) in 17 out of 20 tournaments (85%) ranks highest in FIFA World Cup finals history.

It makes Germany the best team in the history of the tournament in terms of final positions, if points were awarded proportionally for a title, runner-up finish, third-place finish, semi-final and quarter-final appearances.

What was the violence in the 1990 World Cup?

How Italia 90 changed what it meant to be a soccer fan – Stadio delle Alpi, Turin, Italy, World Cup 1990, via Wikipedia O ne night in Turin, a helicopter buzzed over an illuminated bowl that was filled with sound and life. This was the Stadio delle Alpi, the Stadium of the Alps. Europe’s highest mountain range could be seen to the west, looming out of the evening dusk.

• The brand new stadium had been purpose-built for the 1990 World Cup finals — Italia 90.
• Like some futuristic update of an ancient Roman amphitheater, its sleek oval design seemed more reminiscent of a downed flying saucer than a traditional soccer ground.
• In the streets around the stadium, streams of football fans and convoys of supporters’ coaches filed closer as kick-off approached.

The date was July 4, 1990, and the occasion was England v West Germany in the World Cup semi-finals. Inside the stadium, England fans were heavily outnumbered. The English Football Association had been given an official allocation of just 3,000 tickets, in a stadium that held more than 70,000.

• But the English were highly visible — sunburnt and merry after a month in Italy.
• Many wore Umbro England shirts with a shiny diamond-embossed fabric and logo-trimmed collars and sleeves.
• Some were shirtless, with British bulldog tattoos, Union Jack shorts, and Three Lions caps.
• The advertising hoardings, concrete barriers, and perimeter fences were draped with Union Jack and Cross of St George flags bearing the names of teams and towns from up and down the football pyramid and all across England, from Wolves to Workington.

Among the flags was a large white sheet bearing the message ” Pay No Poll Tax “, a protest against the UK government’s recently-introduced community charge, which had provoked mass riots across the country, and would lead to the downfall of Margaret Thatcher.

1. One England fan was photographed standing on the terrace reading the Sun, with the tabloid’s front page on the day of the match reporting a knighthood for the popular disc jockey and TV personality Jimmy Savile, who would later be revealed as a serial pedophile.
2. These were indications that, even with the troubles of the 1980s consigned to history, not all was rosy in England’s green and pleasant land.

Facing the England fans, beyond the perimeter fences on the running track that circled the pitch, stood a line of Italian carabinieri, caps on their heads, sashes over their shoulders, pistols on their hips, and German shepherds at their sides. The atmosphere ahead of England’s biggest football match since 1966 was equal parts excitement and tension.

This World Cup semi-final, and Italia 90 as a whole, would help shape the future of football, and change what it meant to be a football fan. Italia 90 was the World Cup of Toto Schillaci’s goals, Roger Milla’s shimmies, and, ultimately for England fans, Gazza’s tears, It wasn’t necessarily a classic tournament, with negative tactics and a lack of goals contributing to some pretty dour matches.

But the lasting influence of Italia 90 has more to do with what happened off the pitch than on it. Football had been the popular game for more than a hundred years, yet football fans remained, to some extent, outsiders. Society in general tended to look down on football fans, particularly following the troubles of the 1970s and 1980s.

1. Outside of the working class, it wasn’t socially acceptable to be a football fan.
2. Italia 90 helped begin to change that.
3. On the night of the semi-final, while England played at the Stadio delle Alpi, the Rolling Stones played at Wembley Stadium.
4. Across London, 75-year-old Frank Sinatra played a Fourth of July concert at the former Docklands Arena.

Ordinarily, Stones and Sinatra fans with expensive gig tickets might have entirely ignored the football. But on this night concert-goers followed the semi-final on pocket radios and mini televisions, and, when their team did well, chanted, “Eng-er-land, Eng-er-land.” Meanwhile, in homes and pubs around England, 26.2 million people — half the population — watched the match on television.

England’s roads and places of entertainment were virtually deserted,” reported the Times of London, adding that an evening debate in the House of Commons was interrupted so MPs could watch TV. BBC viewers were greeted by the network’s now-iconic Italia 90 theme tune, the Nessun Dorma aria from Puccini’s Turandot, performed by Pavarotti.

(ITV viewers had to make do with Peter Van Hooke’s Tutti Al Mondo,) The popularity of Nessun Dorma, which reached number two in the UK singles chart during the World Cup, united opera and football fans, and helped create a bridge between two supposed highbrow and lowbrow cultures. England Italia 90 World Cup Panini stickers, and World In Motion by England New Order, photo Paul Brown The tournament also had another soundtrack (actually England’s official World Cup theme), World in Motion by New Order, fresh from the success of their Ibiza-infused Technique album.

• The genius of World in Motion was, as John Barnes’ now-famous rap admitted, “this ain’t a football song”,
• There was talk in the lyrics of creating space and beating your man, but it was really a song about peace and love — a celebration of togetherness.
• Love’s got the world in motion,” the chorus proclaimed before, only at the end, throwing in “We’re playing for England, En-ger-land!” World in Motion seemed to reflect a change that was occurring on Britain’s football terraces, propelled by the emergent new youth movement — rave culture.

The rise of rave was undeniably linked to the growing popularity of MDMA, popularly known as Ecstasy or E. The recreational drug became widely available in Britain from around 1988, fuelling all-night dance parties in clubs and warehouses. Underground raves were an enticing proposition for Britain’s working-class youths, and inevitably attracted football fans from the same demographic.

• But the psychedelic effects of E created a very different atmosphere than could be found at matches.
• Almost overnight, the box cutter-wielding troublemaker metamorphosed into the ‘love thug’,” wrote Simon Reynolds in his book Generation Ecstasy,
• Rival football firms were going to the same clubs and raves, but there was no trouble because they were “so loved up on E” and “too busy dancing and bonding with their mates”.

It would be easy to overstate the influence of E on football. Not all fans were loved up on artificial stimulants. But the rise in popularity of rave culture was indicative of a change in attitude and atmosphere that did filter onto the terraces. World in Motion tapped into the connection between football and rave culture, and promoted a tolerant and peaceful approach to football fandom.

• It also promoted positive belief in an England team that arrived at Italia 90 with pundits giving them little to no chance.
• New Order’s Peter Hook said the song “enhanced patriotism”.
• This was an era before every other vehicle on English roads flew a Cross of St George during an international football tournament.

Before 1990, just about the most commitment the casual fan gave to showing their support for England was to collect World Cup coins or Panini stickers. World in Motion, and the atmosphere that inspired it, encouraged fans to go out in replica shirts, have a few beers, throw their arms around their mates, and holler, “En-ger-land!” It encouraged England fans to love the game again.

1. But England might not have participated in the 1990 World Cup had the government, in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster, agreed to a suggestion to withdraw from the tournament.
2. Although Margaret Thatcher was advised that the forthcoming Taylor Report into the disaster would be “very damning” of the police and would attach “little or no blame” to the fans, the government’s focus remained on crowd trouble.

A government committee suggested the World Cup would provide a “natural focus” for hooliganism, and the national team should be withdrawn. However, writing to Thatcher in late 1989, her then-deputy Geoffrey Howe advised that withdrawal would not be useful as “determined hooligans will make their way to Italy anyway and find a different cause to champion”.

• In fact, crowd trouble at football was declining, and the media’s lust for violence had seen its focus shift in the first half of 1990 to the Poll Tax riots, the Strangeways prison riot, and the continuing series of IRA bombings.
• Arrests at football matches in England and Wales fell by nine percent in the 1989–90 season.

There had been no discernible drop-off in match attendances following Hillsborough, although crowd numbers remained in a plateau that had existed throughout the 1980s, with a First Division average of 20,757 in 1989–90. So football violence was down, but football itself remained in a depression.

With English clubs banned from European competition following the Heysel disaster, the England national team was effectively exiled to the island of Sardinia for its three group-stage World Cup matches. Around 5,000 England fans stayed in Sardinia for the duration of the group stage, with several thousand traveling to the mainland after the team qualified for the knockout stages.

Fan-led efforts to support traveling fans included the creation by the recently-formed Football Supporters’ Association (FSA) of football embassies, which provided advice and information, and aimed to act as a form of “damage-limiter” to keep fans away from trouble.

1. In a further effort to prevent trouble, the Football Association and the Home Office compiled a list of a thousand banned supporters.
2. Football fans had been subject to banning orders since the implementation of the 1986 Public Order Act, originally introduced by the Thatcher government to tackle striking miners (referred to by the prime minister as “the enemy within”).

Then fans were singled out in the 1989 Football Supporters Act, which was supposed to restrict foreign travel, but was wrongly drafted and could only be applied to domestic football. As a result, several of England’s most “notorious” hooligans were able to travel to Italy.

The worst trouble involving English fans during Italia 90 was the so-called “Battle of Rimini”, in which around 60 troublemakers in England shirts clashed with police in riot gear, exchanging plastic chairs and tear gas. Groups of local youths, some thought to be ultras, were blamed for igniting the violence.

The ultras were fanatical groups associated with Italian clubs that emerged during the late 1960s and early 1970s, at the same time as British hooligan firms. But England fans survived the Battle of Rimini, and England won the round-of-16 match against Belgium, then beat Cameroon in the quarter-finals to set up the semi-final against West Germany.

• For England fans heading to Turin, there was as much trepidation as excitement.
• Fears of heavy-handed police and Italian ultras were as much of a concern as the potential actions of a minority of English troublemakers.
• On arrival at Turin railway station, English fans were separated from other travelers and were violently shoved and corralled by baton-wielding police.

“Turin had hooligan psychosis like no one else,” wrote Pete Davies in his acclaimed Italia 90 account All Played Out, Davies despaired of the “drunkenness, stupidity and violence” of some England fans, but he also criticized the aggressive policing, which he said was a “paranoid over-reaction to media and ministerial prophecies of doom”.

English football fans, Davies said, had effectively been criminalized for the duration of the tournament. Then came the match, the England v West Germany semi-final in the Stadio delle Alpi, with only a few thousand English fans in attendance, and half the population of England watching on TV. The key moments of the match would remain familiar to all who saw them.

Andreas Brehme’s shot was deflected into the England net off Paul Parker, then Gary Lineker scored an equalizer. It was 1–1 after 90 minutes, and still 1–1 after extra time. Into the penalty shoot-out. Stuart Pearce and Chris Waddle both missed, and England lost.

1. West Germany would go on to beat Argentina in the final.) England fans in the Stadio delle Alpi held their heads in their hands.
2. Those at home did what the English seem to do in times of adversity — they made a cup of tea.
3. Half the population switched on their kettles after Waddle’s miss, creating a huge surge in demand for electricity rated at 2,200 megawatts (“equivalent to that used by four Liverpools”).

But, after such a devastating result, some England fans needed something a little stronger than a cuppa. At the end of the BBC’s match coverage, presenter Des Lynam addressed viewers and said, “If you are having a drink tonight, have a drink with pride, not aggression.” Some fans did go out and vent their frustrations, smashing windows and “damaging German makes of cars”, but the majority were able to swallow their pride and accept the defeat with dignity.

1. England fans had suffered together, and there was something comforting about the fact that it had been such a large-scale communal experience.
2. As long-standing fans already knew, and newcomers were just finding out, winning isn’t everything in football.
3. The semi-final defeat was a unifying experience, bringing together people from different backgrounds and walks of life, all united by their support of a football team.

Italia 90 seemed to push football towards the forefront of British popular culture, making it more widely acceptable to be a football fan. “Lots of different kinds of people got interested in football, all different classes of people,” reflected England’s Gary Lineker.

I think it had a significant effect on the growth of football.” The England team did not win the World Cup, but they did win the Italia 90 FIFA Fair Play trophy. And the behavior of the vast majority of England fans was equally creditable. According to the Guardian, far from retaining their position as the world’s number one football hooligans, England fans had behaved “rather better” than either the West Germans or Italians.

Two days after the World Cup final, UEFA agreed to re-admit English clubs into European competition (with the exception of Liverpool, who would be readmitted in the following season). It felt like the beginning of a fresh start for English football, with the slate wiped clean.

“1990 may come to be seen as a turning point in the course of football,” said the Times, There was still a way to go before the game could properly move on from the failings of the 1970s and 80s. But Italia 90 seemed like a turning point, persuading disillusioned fans to fall back in love with the game.

Two years later, in 1992, came the formation of the Premier League, and all of the bells and whistles that came with it. Football, and the experience of being a football fan, was changed forever. ♦ Paul Brown is the author of Savage Enthusiasm: A History of Football Fans,

Is Netherlands good at soccer

WORLD CUP HISTORY/MAJOR HONORS – The Dutch have reached the final on three occasions (1974, 1978, 2010). Many observers have claimed the Netherlands was the best team not to win a FIFA World Cup, falling twice to host teams, Germany (1974) and Argentina (1978).

• The squad also lost to Spain in extra time in the 2010 championship match in South Africa and took third place at the 2014 tournament in Brazil.
• Participating in its 11th World Cup, the Oranje have reached the knockout stage nine consecutive times since 1974.
• The team has fared better at the European Championship, winning the title in 1988 behind such legends as Marco van Basten, Ruud Gullit, Frank Rijkaard and Ronald Koeman.

The Netherlands reached the semifinals three times (1992, 2000, 2004). At Euro 2020, the Dutch were eliminated in the Round of 16.

Has Netherlands won any trophy

Netherlands

Nickname(s)	Oranje Holland Clockwork Orange The Flying Dutchmen
Association	Koninklijke Nederlandse Voetbalbond (KNVB)
Confederation	UEFA (Europe)
Head coach	Ronald Koeman
Captain	Virgil van Dijk
Most caps	Wesley Sneijder (134)
Top scorer	Robin van Persie ( 50 )
Home stadium	Johan Cruyff Arena De Kuip Philips Stadion De Grolsch Veste
FIFA code	NED
First colours Second colours

/td> FIFA ranking Current 7 (21 September 2023) Highest 1 (August 2011) Lowest 36 (August 2017) First international Belgium 1–4 Netherlands ( Antwerp, Belgium ; 30 April 1905) Biggest win Netherlands 11–0 San Marino ( Eindhoven, Netherlands ; 2 September 2011) Biggest defeat England Amateurs 12–2 Netherlands ( Darlington, England ; 21 December 1907) World Cup Appearances 11 ( first in 1934 ) Best result Runners-up ( 1974, 1978, 2010 ) European Championship Appearances 10 ( first in 1976 ) Best result Champions ( 1988 ) Nations League Appearances 2 ( first in 2019 ) Best result Runners-up ( 2019 ) Medal record Website onsoranje.nl (in Dutch)

The Netherlands men’s national football team ( Dutch : Nederlands voetbalelftal or simply Het Nederlands elftal ) has represented the Netherlands in international men’s football matches since 1905. The men’s national team is controlled by the Royal Dutch Football Association (KNVB), the governing body for football in the Netherlands, which is a part of UEFA, under the jurisdiction of FIFA,

1. They were sometimes regarded as the greatest national team of the respective generations.
2. Most of the Netherlands home matches are played at the Johan Cruyff Arena, De Kuip, Philips Stadion and De Grolsch Veste,
3. The team is colloquially referred to as Het Nederlands Elftal (The Dutch Eleven) or Oranje, after the House of Orange-Nassau and their distinctive orange jerseys.

Informally the team, like the country itself, was referred to as Holland, The fan club is known as Het Oranje Legioen (The Orange Legion). The Netherlands has competed in eleven FIFA World Cups, appearing in the final three times (in 1974, 1978 and 2010 ).

They finished runners-up on all three occasions. They have also appeared in ten UEFA European Championships, winning the 1988 tournament in West Germany. Additionally, the team won a bronze medal at the Olympic football tournament in 1908, 1912 and 1920, The Netherlands has long-standing football rivalries with neighbours Belgium and Germany,

They are often regarded as the best country to never win the World Cup.

Why is Netherlands so good at soccer?

Oh, there is very simple answer to that: wealth, the distribution of it and youth programs. To become very proficient at football one cannot suffice anymore by doing it on the fly. One needs prolonged and rigorous training. Clubs scout for young kids and take them into their youth programs were they get this training.

Who got the golden boot in 1990 World Cup

FIFA World Cup Golden Boot winners –

Number	FIFA World Cup Edition	Top Goalscorer (Country)	Goals Scored
1	Uruguay 1930	Guillermo Stabile (Argentina)	8
2	Italy 1934	Oldrich Nejedly (Czech Republic)	5
3	France 1938	Leonidas (Brazil)	7
4	Brazil 1950	Ademir (Brazil)	8
5	Switzerland 1954	Sandor Kocsis (Hungary)	11
6	Sweden 1958	Just Fontaine (France)	13
7	Chile 1962	Florian Albert (Hungary) Valentin Ivanov (Soviet Union) Garrincha (Brazil) Vava (Brazil) Drazan Jerkovic (Yugoslavia) Leonel Sanchez (Chile)	4
8	England 1966	Eusebio (Portugal)	9
9	Mexico 1970	Gerd Muller (Germany)	10
10	West Germany 1974	Grzegorz Lato (Poland)	7
11	Argentina 1978	Mario Kempes (Argentina)	6
12	Spain 1982	Paolo Rossi (Italy)	6
13	Mexico 1986	Gary Lineker (England)	6
14	Italy 1990	Salvatore Schillaci (Italy)	6
15	USA 1994	Oleg Salenko (Russia) Hristo Stoichkov (Bulgaria)	6
16	France 1998	Davor Suker (Croatia)	6
17	South Korea/Japan 2002	Ronaldo (Brazil)	8
18	Germany 2006	Miroslav Klose (Germany)	5
19	South Africa 2010	Thomas Muller (Germany)	5
20	Brazil 2014	James Rodríguez (Colombia)	6
21	Russia 2018	Harry Kane (England)	6
22	Qatar 2022	Kylian Mbappe	8

Add this to your favourites IND

How many World Cup Argentina won?

Most appearances – Lionel Messi has captained the team in 19 matches. Lionel Messi ‘s total of 26 matches is a record for the side and the most for a player at the FIFA World Cup.

Rank	Player	Matches	World Cups
1	Lionel Messi	26	2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2022
2	Diego Maradona	21	1982, 1986, 1990 and 1994
3	Javier Mascherano	20	2006, 2010, 2014 and 2018
4	Mario Kempes	18	1974, 1978 and 1982
5	Ángel Di María	17	2010, 2014, 2018 and 2022
6	Oscar Ruggeri	16	1986, 1990 and 1994
7
Jorge Burruchaga	14	1986 and 1990
Gonzalo Higuaín	14	2010, 2014 and 2018
9	Ubaldo Fillol	13	1974, 1978 and 1982

When was the last World Cup in Italy

1990 FIFA World Cup Italy™

Has Nigeria beaten Argentina

Overall, Nigeria have played 22 matches across six World Cups, and of those, five have been against Argentina – losing all.

Who has won Argentina or Croatia

Lionel Messi magic sends Argentina to World Cup final with win over Croatia. Lionel Messi put on a sensational display as he helped Argentina secure a spot in the World Cup final with a comfortable 3-0 victory over Croatia on Tuesday.

Has Cameroon ever beat Brazil?

Brazil won all seven previous meetings with African teams at the World Cup, including beating Cameroon in 1994 and 2014. They might not have made it through to the next stage of the World Cup tournament but Cameroon’s supporters departed Lusail Stadium in Qatar knowing their team had made history by beating Brazil,

Capping a series of stunning upsets football fans have now become accustomed to at the Qatar 2022 World Cup, Cameroon delivered a shock 1-0 defeat to Brazil on Friday night – the first time an African nation has beaten the Brazilians at the World Cup. Brazil has won all seven previous meetings with African teams at the World Cup, including beating Cameroon in 1994 and again in 2014.

But the historic victory was not enough for Cameroon to qualify for the next Round of 16 after securing third place in Group G behind Brazil and Switzerland, who defeated Serbia 3-2 in the other final group match on Friday. “We feel great, don’t you feel great? It is so satisfying.

• I’m very happy.
• We finally beat Brazil,” John Epanty, who is from Cameroon, told Al Jazeera after the match.
• Brazil is one of the best teams in the world.
• If you’re looking for a consolation win, you want this victory,” he said.
• Fellow Cameroonian Caleb Williams predicted celebrations would go on all night back in Cameroon.

“They are already drinking and will be till morning,” Williams said. “I mean, we took out Brazil, that’s huge,” he told Al Jazeera. The winning goal from Vincent Aboubakar came in the closing 92nd minute of the game and apart from bringing victory, it also electrified supporters of the Indomitable Lions at Lusail Stadium who had likely expected the game to end in a draw. Players in action during the Cameroon vs Brazil, Group G match at the FIFA World Cup 2022, December 2, Lusail Stadium After the match and though few in number, the Cameroon supporters made the very best of the special moment, singing the praise of their team while media cameras swarmed to record the aftermath of the historic win.

Brazilian fans joined in the celebrations too, knowing they lost but had already qualified for the next stage which will see them face South Korea on December 5. Still, the shock of Cameroon’s goal in the dying minutes of the game was too much for some Brazil supporters. “I don’t feel so good,” Patricia Luze from Sao Paolo told Al Jazeera.

“I was not expecting that goal,” said Luze, who has tickets for the World Cup final and is hoping to see her team compete in that match. “The final is here and I hope to be here again when we will, by God’s grace, raise the cup again,” she said. Before kick-off on Friday, the contingent of Cameroonian fans at Lusail were clearly outnumbered by the thousands of Brazil fans who turned Lusail into a sea of yellow and green. A Brazil football fan during the Cameroon vs Brazil, Group G, FIFA World Cup 2022, on December 2, at Lusail Stadium The victory was “bittersweet”, said Samuel Ngassam from Douala in Cameroon. “Yes, we beat Brazil. I am proud,” he said. “But there are many lessons from this we must take,” Ngassam told Al Jazeera while a group of nearby Brazilian fans called him to join them for a short video.

1. Ngassam said the Cameroon team “should have shown more heart” and that, in their earlier games, it appeared as though they would have settled for draws.
2. Tonight, however, was not about qualifying for the next round of the World Cup, it was all about Brazil, he said.
3. Today we beat Brazil.
4. That’s all that matters,” he added.

“I’ll worry about everything else when I wake up.”

Why was Chile banned from 1994 World Cup

World Cup scandal! The unbelievable plot to eliminate Brazil Join the World Cup conversation at

• Scandal! How a deceitful plot almost cost Brazil their place at the 1990 World Cup
• The crime scen e: Brazil’s Maracana stadium.
• The hero : a photographer who wouldn’t be fooled
• Discover: how a Chilean goalkeeper, a stray flare, and a hidden razor blade fooled officials

It’s one of the greatest World Cup scandals and 25 years on Chile return Wednesday to the “crime scene” that resulted in the South American country being banned from the 1994 World Cup. It’s a story of brazen deceit and shameless subterfuge and had it not been for the photographic skills of just one man, Brazil’s unimpeachable record of being the only side to have competed at every tournament would have been put into serious jeopardy.

• Victory for either Brazil or Chile in their final qualifier at the Maracana Stadium would have taken them to the 1990 World Cup.
• With 20 minutes left, Brazil were 1-0 up and looking good for qualification, especially since a draw would also take them through.
• Then, their world suddenly fell apart.
• In the Chile penalty area, goalkeeper Roberto Rojas was prostrate on the floor, seemingly hit by a flare that was still fizzing and pumping smoke into the sky just inches from him.

Chile had a plan which they had prepared and it was unbelievable, truly unbelievable. Former Brazil captain Gomes

1. As legendary Brazilians Bebeto, Dunga and Careca looked on, Chile’s players rushed towards Rojas – furiously beckoning the medical staff once they had reached him.
2. With the blood leaking from his head turning his jersey crimson, Rojas was soon carried off the pitch and, as booing filled a bewildered Maracana, the match officials soon abandoned the game.
3. With the flare having been thrown from a Brazilian section of the stadium, football’s greatest superpower – Brazil has won the World Cup five times – was facing an unprecedented elimination.

“I was terrorized,” Ricardo Gomes, Brazil captain on the day, told CNN. “I thought immediately of losing the chance to go to the World Cup. It was something really bad.” Now was working as a pitch-side photographer that day. “Amazing as it may sound, no TV camera caught the moment the flare flew over and supposedly hit the goalkeeper,” he told CNN.

• With neither TV nor photographic evidence to prove otherwise, Brazil were in deep trouble but, wholly unbeknown to them, they were on the wrong side of an enormous hoax.
• In a planned incident, Rojas – a highly-respected goalkeeper who was playing for Brazilian side Sao Paulo at the time – had used a razor blade hidden in his gloves to cut his own head while lying on the floor.
• It was the most Machiavellian play to ensure Brazil’s elimination, but no one in Brazil had any hope of proving that.
• Unless evidence could be found.
• “Now of course – with all the cameras on mobile phones around – it would have been impossible,” said Gomes.

“I missed the shot and so did most of the photographers,” recalled Teixeira. “But there was one guy by me – Ricardo Alfieri, a good friend – and I asked him: ‘Ricardo, did you capture the flare?’ He said: ‘Of course, about 4-5 shots.'” Teixeira immediately realized the huge significance of the shots but in an age when cameras recorded images onto slides, rather than digitally, obstacles remained.

1. Ricardo had a problem.
2. He was on assignment for a Japanese magazine and had to send the films to Tokyo – unprocessed – the next morning, and the Japanese would only trust their laboratory,” recalled Teixiera of his fellow photographer, who now works for the South American governing body Conmebol.
3. I said to Ricardo: ‘Listen, you are the only one to have the evidence that Rojas is lying and cheating.

I won’t let you out of my country with those films unprocessed.'” Just after the game had been abandoned, Teixeira had watched aghast as a Chilean pundit told a local radio station how he had seen the flare hit Rojas, so turning the knife into Brazil’s unprotected back.

• So I found the radio reporter and told him Ricardo had the shots.
• He put Ricardo live on air and the whole atmosphere changed,” Teixeira recalled.
• Ten minutes later, Brazilian football president Ricardo Teixeira walked into the dressing room where we were.
• He was livid – his face white, black, red, yellow – all colors.

“‘Who has the films?’ he asked. I have them, I answered. I was the biggest asset on earth at that point and Teixeira was always asking if I was sure about the shots. But I knew I could rely on Alfieri’s word, because he was the best.” So began a frantic – and equally anxious – scramble to see if the images really proved that Rojas had cheated.

1. It took four hours to warm up and prepare the laboratory.
2. The lab lady was furious – having been dragged out of her Sunday to work at night,” Teixeira said.
3. While the lab was heating up, so were the deliberations over which agency would get the pictures.
4. With one baulking at Teixeira’s demand for five thousand dollars, the famous Globo network agreed to stump up the sum for the images.

“When the pictures came out, there were four clear shots – starting with the device flying and then landing one meter away from Rojas. (CBF president) Teixeira was so relieved,” said the agent Teixeira. I met Rojas many years later and he admitted his mistakes.

He is not naughty but that day, he had a lapse – a really bad decision. Former Brazil captain Gomes On the Monday evening, Globo ran the scoop – showing pictures that proved Rojas’ play-acting – in a program called “Jornal Nacional”, a copy of which CBF boss Teixeira showed to FIFA after flying to their headquarters in Switzerland.

Satisfied by the documentary evidence, football’s world governing body awarded Brazil a 2-0 technical victory that duly took the nation to the 1990 finals. FIFA ruled that Chile had broken the regulation of leaving the pitch before a game’s conclusion and then issued a final judgment, suspended Chile from the 1994 World Cup.

1. Then just 32, Rojas could continue to work in football however and as he licked his wounds back home in Chile, help came from an unexpected source – Brazil itself.
2. “In 1993, Sao Paulo coach Tele Santana and the club president traveled to the Chilean capital Santiago to ask Roberto to work at the club as the goalkeeping trainer,” Viviane Rojas, his wife, told CNN.
3. Rojas declined an interview request on the grounds of poor health.
4. The 56-year-old, whose FIFA ban was lifted in 2001, has been awaiting a liver transplant for three years now, after contracting Hepatitis C, and underwent a five-hour operation in March to relieve the accumulation of fluid in his lungs, according to Viviane.

Despite his elaborate attempts to deny Brazilians what they consider to be their sporting birth right (i.e. playing at the World Cup), Viviane says Rojas receives no animosity as they live their life in Sao Paulo. “Here in Brazil, Roberto has always been loved,” she said.

“The most important thing for Brazilians is that he has, in his interviews, come across as a human being with a very distinct and good character. He has admitted his guilt and been forgiven. “He showed his strength of character through his work and after training (Sao Paulo) goalkeeper Rogerio Ceni to be one of the best, Roberto also coached Sao Paulo for a brief spell from 2003 – qualifying the team for the Copa Libertadores.” Viviane’s sentiments are backed up by former Brazil captain Gomes, who bears no malice towards a man who could have stolen his only chance of playing in the World Cup finals.

“I met Rojas many years later and he admitted his mistakes. He is not naughty but that day, he had a lapse – a really bad decision,” Gomes said.

• “Chile had a plan which they had prepared and it was unbelievable, truly unbelievable.
• “The strangest thing is they had a good team.”
• On Wednesday, Chile are back in the Maracana as they continue their 2014 World Cup campaign with their second group game against Spain.
• Given Spain lost their first game, while Chile won their opener it should be a cracker – but hopefully without the fireworks of the 1989 game.

: World Cup scandal! The unbelievable plot to eliminate Brazil

Has Brazil ever missed a World Cup?

Football is in the heart, mind, and soul of Brazil. It is not just an accessory for the South American nation but a synonym. That Brazilian passion for the sport has translated itself into tangible success. Since the beginning of the competition, Brazil have never missed an edition of the FIFA World Cup.

Why did Brazil lose FIFA World Cup

Brazil’s World Cup exit: What went wrong for Neymar, Tite? – ESPN play Twellman: It was a huge choke job from Brazil (1:31) Taylor Twellman lays into Brazil’s “inexcusable” defeat to Croatia in the quarter-finals of the 2022 FIFA World Cup. (1:31) When crash out of a World Cup it doesn’t take long for shock and sadness to be replaced by anger in the country.

A villain has to be appointed; usually it is the coach. And, after getting no further than the quarterfinals in two consecutive tournaments, Tite is an easy target. The knives have extra sharpness this time because of Tite’s conduct immediately after Friday’s penalty-shootout defeat against, No, he did not flee the scene, as his harshest critics allege.

But after speaking to a few of his players he retreated to the dressing room. Many would have liked to have seen him out on the field at the darkest hour, sharing the pain of his players. The expectations for Brazil are higher than anywhere else, but yet again the Seleção have fallen at their first meeting with a European side in the knockout stage.

1. And the conquerors keep getting smaller.
2. In 2018, it was, with a population of under 12 million.
3. This time it was Croatia, with less than four million.
4. So where did it go wrong? The short answer is that penalties were forced by a moment entirely untypical of the Tite team – caught out on the counterattack with the team up 1-0 and the finish line in sight, the game sent to a shootout by ‘s goal (Croatia’s only shot on target), which needed a deflection to get past goalkeeper,

The fatal move is being analysed, analysed and analysed again; pressure and extra time can do strange things to a team. Should they press high as usual or drop off? What they should not have done is attempt both at the same time. Croatia built their move in the gaps, where maybe midfielder should have been more prudent than to try to win the ball and get the wrong side of, play Moreno: Why was Neymar left on after Brazil’s goal? Ale Moreno wasn’t impressed by Neymar’s display against Croatia, despite his great goal. But why did it get to this, anyway? Why had Brazil not been able to dispatch Croatia long before, as most had expected? Injuries did not help – in two ways.

• First, they weakened one of the most interesting characteristics of this Brazil side: the attacking press.
• Neymar was not 100%, playing within himself as he shook off an ankle injury suffered earlier in the tournament.
• Yet the real problem was that striker was clearly struggling.
• Brazil’s No.9 is the leader of the press and his harrying brought two goals in the previous round against, but he was carrying a thigh problem.

Brazil had subs warming up after five minutes, but they kept Richarlison on the field. Had been available then he would surely have been thrown on earlier, but the striker was, and so, without another striker capable of pressing the opposition, Richarlison soldiered on for just over an hour.

• This was extremely important.
• It meant that Croatia could play out from the back in relative comfort and bring their splendid midfielders into the game, from where they could spend plenty of time, if not threatening the Brazil goal, at least dictating the rhythm and running down the clock.
• The other area where injuries played a part was at full-back.

Left-back was nowhere near fit enough to start and only played the last 15 minutes, while his reserve had already been ruled out of the tournament. And so first choice right-back, himself not 100%, moved to the left while centre-back filled in down the right. play What went wrong for Brazil against Croatia? Ale Moreno gives his take on Tite’s approach that sees Brazil crashing out again in a World Cup quarterfinal. Against massed defences the ability to construct from deep is crucial. Until he tired, Militao attempted heroically to burst forward down his flank, but the team missed the capacity of Alex Sandro to appear in the attacking line as an element of surprise. In the past year and a half Brazil developed a way of playing with two wingers. took instantly to international football on the right flank; on the left matured into a global star and produced his best Brazil performances to date in this tournament. And then, in the last few months the goal-scoring form of Richarlison forced his inclusion at centre-forward.

• This collection of attacking talent rolled over South Korea.
• But Brazil found it harder in the tougher games.
• Did this formation leave them light in midfield? This certainly seemed the case against Croatia when, without an aggressive press, Brazil ran the risk of being outnumbered three to two in central areas.

And there was also a problem in the construction of the moves. Before the emergence of the wingers, the best aspect of Brazil’s attacking play was the link-up between Neymar and, But afterwards the two of them were often too far apart to combine effectively.

1. It is worth remembering that Neymar’s wonderful goal against Croatia was a special moment in both individual and collective terms.
2. Had been thrown on to help Brazil play their way through the middle, and Neymar exchanged passes both with him and then – gloriously – with Paqueta before going wide on the keeper and scoring a goal that answered any questions that were being posed about his contribution to the cause.

Had he spent more time closer to Paqueta, maybe Brazil would have found it easier to break down rival defences. But even with the injuries, and with possible doubts about the team formation, Brazil appeared to have done enough to get past Croatia and move into the semifinals.

1. One fateful loss of defensive focus and two missed penalties bring Tite’s reign to an end two games earlier than he would have liked.
2. His is a cruel departure.
3. For the second time his team are out after a quarterfinal when they surely deserved more.
4. He knows that plenty of criticism is coming his way, but after the match he declared that he was at peace with himself – and so he should be.

A pair of narrow defeats can’t take away the impression that for more than six years he has steered the ship with competence and dignity. : Brazil’s World Cup exit: What went wrong for Neymar, Tite? – ESPN

Why was Italia 90 special?

You only have to listen to the classic opening title sequence used by the BBC for their Italia ’90 World Cup coverage to be transported back to those balmy summer nights thirty years ago. Of course, back then, I had no idea what the words of Puccini’s spine-tingling aria meant, but they somehow captured the transformation of football from just a game to something altogether more profound.

In fact, Italia 90 bore all the characteristics of a Puccini opera – beauty, drama, passion, tragedy, romance and realism, expertly crafted together to create a single unifying spectacle. That said, the final between West Germany and Argentina was by no means a classic. An ill-tempered, scrappy affair in which the referee was disgracefully manhandled and two Argentines were sent off, the Germans won thanks only to an Andreas Brehme penalty.

Notwithstanding it’s ugly finale, Italia 90 remains a seminal moment in world football. As we approach the 30th anniversary of Italia 90, a surge of misty-eyed nostalgia is inevitable. Already twitter handles have been launched and podcasts devoted to recounting the tournament are in production.

From Verona, one of the twelve host cities, respected sports journalist Matteo Fontana has published his own account of that era-defining tournament, Un’estate in Italia (A summer in Italy). Matteo is a child of the eighties, and although he also remembers Mexico ’86, Italia ’90 was the first world cup that really affected him.

All the more so since for him it was on home soil. Stop and think about that for a moment. You are a football crazy kid. You are still basking in the glory of your local team (Hellas Verona) winning a unique scudetto and then, aged twelve, the world cup turns up on your doorstep! Having experienced these two momentous events at first hand, is it any wonder that he has dedicated so much of his life to observing and recounting the beautiful game? Fontana’s back catalogue includes a biography of scudetto winning Hellas Verona coach Osvaldo Bagnoli ( Il miracoliere.

L’allenatore operaio ) and an exploration of football during Italy’s troubled Years of Lead ( Cavalli selvaggi. Campioni romantici e ribelli nell’Italia di piombo ). His writing diligently places football within it’s wider social, economic and cultural context. He even provides a soundtrack, a power ballad laden list to transport you back to the long hot summer of 1990 when guitars were electric and mullets were in.

Fontana is also drawn to the big characters and personalities of the game, and Italia 90 had no shortage of those, from grizzled veterans like Maradona and Milla, to flamboyant young showmen like Paul Gascoigne and Roberto Baggio. In England, the World Cup brought together the nation as no event had since 1966.

Gascoigne’s tears in that epic semi-final against West Germany remain one of the defining images of world cup history, a watershed moment that launched Gazzamania and gave an early insight into the fragile psyche of that troubled genius. Equally memorable, David Platt’s late extra time winner against Belgium in the first knock out round and the five-goal thriller against Roger Milla’s Cameroon in the quarter final.

Off the pitch, the collaboration between John Barnes and New Order provided the only example before or since of a credible World Cup team song. Just 18 months later, on the crest of the wave of commercial interest that followed Italia 90, the FA Premier League was founded, reversing the long years of hooliganism, falling attendances and ageing stadiums.

Salvatore “Toto” Schillaci had spent most of his early career with Messina in the lower tiers of Italian football. His breakthrough came in 1989 when, after scoring 23 goals in a season for Messina in Serie B, he was snapped up by Juventus. The following season he scored 15 goals for Juve as they won both the Italian Cup and the UEFA Cup, but with Vialli, Mancini and Carnevale vying for Italy’s two starting berths up front, Schillaci seemed destined to see out the world cup from the bench.

But, with fifteen minutes remaining at Rome’s Stadio Olimpico and Italy struggling to capitalise against Austria in their opening match of the tournament, Schillaci was sent on in place of Carnevale. Within four minutes the Sicilian had latched on to a Vialli cross to secure a vital victory for the Italians.

Despite his dramatic intervention, Schillaci was once again left out as Italy struggled against the USA in the second group game. While the host nation were far from convincing in the early stages, they produced the goal of tournament in the closing game of the group, Roberto Baggio’s Maradona-esque individual effort against Czechoslovakia.

Schillaci started that game and was once again on the score sheet. Against Uruguay in the next round, Schillaci’s 65th minute strike was another contender for goal of the tournament, and he also scored in the quarter-final against Ireland, bringing his tournament tally to four.

He scored again in the semi-final against Argentina and his penalty against England in the third-place playoff secured his place as the tournament’s top scorer with six goals. For his remarkable contribution, Schillaci also won the player of tournament, joining the hallowed ranks of Puskás, Charlton, Pelè, Cruyff, Rossi and Maradona.

He was the unlikely icon of the tournament. A receding hairline. Those bulging Sicilian eyes, that raw, honest passion. For kids like Fontana, ‘Totò’ symbolised the idea that anything was possible. While Schillaci was the arguably the star of the show, there is little doubt who the villain of the piece was.

Diego Armando Maradona had won two championships with Napoli but was widely despised in the north of Italy. When Argentina were beaten 1-0 in Milan by Cameroon, he was mercilessly taunted by the San Siro crowd. But he would have his revenge. Argentina faced the home nation in the semi-final at Napoli’s San Paolo stadium of all places.

After an indifferent start to the tournament, Italy were firm favourites and took the lead through a Schillaci goal. With 20 minutes to go, Argentina rallied and Caniggia scored (the first player to beat Zenga in 10 games). Italy responded positively, but couldn’t find a winner, even with 9 minutes of injury time! Penalties followed.

• Donadoni missed Italy’s penultimate penalty.
• Maradona held his nerve to score for Argentina and when Serena missed Italy’s last it was all over.
• Against the odds, Maradona’s Argentina had won.
• They would face a highly theatrical but effective West-German side in the final, which even Fontana acknowledges is generally considered the worst world cup final ever.

He concludes his account thus: “The World Cup is over. The last images scroll on the Olimpico’s scoreboard. Against the backdrop of the Roman moon, a magical night was over, Luciano Pavarotti sings on the giant screen. Then a message appears: “Ciao Italia”.

• And below: “Hello USA 94”.
• Football wants to conquer the United States.
• Things will never be the same again.” Italia 90 undoubtedly marked a turning point.
• The passing of one era and the beginning of another.
• Market forces would influence the game as never before, while players would become increasingly distant from the fans.

By 1994, something had changed, the climate was different. For Italian football, Italia 90 represented a high point. Serie A would continue to entertain for a few more years to come, but like the giant concrete stadiums with their redundant running tracks, the dream of Italian football was beginning to crumble.

What year did Cameroon beat Argentina?

Argentina 0-1 Cameroon (8 Jun, 1990 ) Final Score – ESPN.

Who knocked England out of the 1990 World Cup?

England lose the decisive penalty shoot-out 4-3 against West Germany in the World Cup semi-final. Gary Lineker, Peter Beardsley and David Platt scored the first three penalties for England, but Stuart Pearce and Chris Waddle failed to convert their kicks, sending Bobby’s Robson’s team crashing out of the competition.

Who got the golden boot in 1990 World Cup

FIFA World Cup Golden Boot winners –

Number	FIFA World Cup Edition	Top Goalscorer (Country)	Goals Scored
1	Uruguay 1930	Guillermo Stabile (Argentina)	8
2	Italy 1934	Oldrich Nejedly (Czech Republic)	5
3	France 1938	Leonidas (Brazil)	7
4	Brazil 1950	Ademir (Brazil)	8
5	Switzerland 1954	Sandor Kocsis (Hungary)	11
6	Sweden 1958	Just Fontaine (France)	13
7	Chile 1962	Florian Albert (Hungary) Valentin Ivanov (Soviet Union) Garrincha (Brazil) Vava (Brazil) Drazan Jerkovic (Yugoslavia) Leonel Sanchez (Chile)	4
8	England 1966	Eusebio (Portugal)	9
9	Mexico 1970	Gerd Muller (Germany)	10
10	West Germany 1974	Grzegorz Lato (Poland)	7
11	Argentina 1978	Mario Kempes (Argentina)	6
12	Spain 1982	Paolo Rossi (Italy)	6
13	Mexico 1986	Gary Lineker (England)	6
14	Italy 1990	Salvatore Schillaci (Italy)	6
15	USA 1994	Oleg Salenko (Russia) Hristo Stoichkov (Bulgaria)	6
16	France 1998	Davor Suker (Croatia)	6
17	South Korea/Japan 2002	Ronaldo (Brazil)	8
18	Germany 2006	Miroslav Klose (Germany)	5
19	South Africa 2010	Thomas Muller (Germany)	5
20	Brazil 2014	James Rodríguez (Colombia)	6
21	Russia 2018	Harry Kane (England)	6
22	Qatar 2022	Kylian Mbappe	8

Add this to your favourites IND